"The handcuff that locked us up together for 50 minutes"

"No comment"

"ms. Cornejo and mr. Lajara"

"Mr. Loverboy"

"Pedro and Maria. They did not know I was taking a picture of them"

"magkakatuluyan ba? Abangan.."

Hahaha. What an experience! May oras din kayo! hahaha

Hello Folks,

We are launching the

The Canadian Charter of

Rights and Freedoms

lawsuit because the Charter is

the biggest

HOAX against the Canadian

People.

There is no accessibility to the courts for victims of Charter Rights violations.

The Provincial Courts don't deal with the Charter even though they have it listed in the Criminal Code Book of Canada.  We have personally gone to the Provincial Court of NS and asked for Charter Rights.

The Provincial Legislature doesn't insure our Charter rights. One can not even address the Provincial Legislature in order to bring up Charter issues.

The Provincially elected MLA's don't even know what the Charter is or how to enforce it.

The House of Commons doesn't allow Canadians to address the House. No Canadian unless elected can address the House of Commons. We have had controversial foreign leaders of controversial countries address the House of Commons, but our own people can not address the House of Commons.

The Speaker of the House has sent me a personal letter refusing my request to address the House of Commons. Our Government, our Democracy. Right!

Our elected Members of Parliament do not know how to direct one to have their Charter Rights upheld. Not one of them know. I have written to all 300 plus members of Parliament and none of them have responded.

O Canada, the telephone directory for Government Services @ 1 800  622 6232 doesn't know where to direct people to get their The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms upheld.

The Prime Minister of Canada doesn't know where to go. He has refused to answer, except for the stupid form letter that says - Sorry don't know.

The Federal Court is supposed to be the place to file all things Federal and especially The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms issues. Not so.   Even they don't know, and won't accept one's statement of claim.

Each Provincial Supreme Court is supposed to uphold The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms but whenever you file anything regarding the Charter  it is completely ignored. The courts systematically and blatantly violate our Guaranteed Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms every day.

Our politicians and our governments, both Provincial and Federal and Municipal violate our Charter of Rights Everyday.

To get your free book about your Charter call The Human Rights Program of the Department of Canadian Heritage.  1 819 994 3458.

Oh, but don't expect them to know ANYTHING about The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms as they only print the books.   It's important that you get the book because there is an item missing in the Charter on the website.  It's in the book and it's Sect. 3.

Section 3 guarantees to all citizens the right to be involved in the election of their governments. It gives them the right to vote in federal , provincial or territorial elections,  along with the right to run for public office themselves. The underlined part is the part that is missing from all other publications.  Get it?

The  Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Dalhousie University expert on the Charter doesn't know. His name is Wayne Mackay, a supposed expert in the Charter.  I had a public radio discussion with him and a private discussion with him and even he couldn't tell me where to go to get  The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms upheld.

There are no Guaranteed Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms  lawyers or law firms in all of Canada.  The law firms don't even have Civil Rights in their areas of practice. Don't believe me?

Go look! Do an Internet search and you will find Civil Rights, then when you access that you will find Human Rights and when you access that you will find LABOUR LAW IN CANADA. You will not find Charter Rights or Civil Rights.

Not one divorced parent in Canada, has broken through the Freedom barrier, in court, to have equal shared parenting of their children, without mandatory child support paid to the other parent.

The broken families and destroyed children by our judicial system is routine.

The Children's Aid Societies all over Canada are invading homes and apprehending someone elses children, for new reason, every day.

Our press and media is not free.

We have no Freedom of Information.

We have no disclosure or transparency from government.

The  stories of police  abuse are rampant.

The ineffectiveness of our Politicians is legendary.

The huge tax grabs of our incomes is criminal.

Get involved. Join Now. You could be a part of history in the making.

If you are a professional, aggressive and knowledgeable lawyer or law firm who is willing to work on contingency to change Canada for the better, call us. Join now.

Email us We are currently creating the largest database of victims.

If you have had your  Guaranteed Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

violated by the government and can prove it with court documents, join now.

Our lawsuit will be about some of the following:

Have you had any of these rights violated?

How about more than one?

• Fundamental Freedoms, Section 2

• Democratic Rights, Section 3,4 and 5

• Mobility rights violations, Section 6

• Legal Rights, Section 7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14

• Equality Rights, Section 15

• Official Languages Rights, Section 16,16.1,17,18,19,20,21 and 22

• Minority Language Educational Rights, Section 23

• Enforcement Rights, Section 24

Join now.

We need your name, address, phone, email and which Sections of your  Charter Rights were violated.

No need to go into your story at this point. Time for that later.

Your information will be kept strictly confidential.

You will need to prove you have been violated with documentation when the time comes, but not now. Just keep it in a safe file for now.

http://thegreatcanadiancharterlawsuit.wordpress.com

Join here.

Connie Brauer

902.798.5267

cbrauer@lincsat.com

The dream had distinct "scenes."

Scene I: I was with my best friend from high school, whom I have tried contacting a few times in the past few years but have not received word back. We were walking together down a city street toward a large, circular open area on a warm afternoon. It reminded me of the circle in downtown Indianapolis, except in the center, there was a huge, shallow pool. There was a street circling this area and on the sidewalk surrounding the pool, many tables were set up with people selling things, like a huge outdoor rummage sale.

My friend and I picked up several videotapes from one of the tables. I suppose we paid for them, I’m not sure. I was thinking most of them were movies of some sort. We got a whole big stack each and carried them one on top of another around the sidewalk. They stacks were wobbling but none fell.

As we walked around the sidewalk, there were some stairs that led into the pool. We both walked into the pool and allowed the stacks of videos to float on the water in front of us. Again, none fell, although the stacks wobbled.

Scene II: My friend and I entered a stadium-like building through an arched gate, one of many around the outside. This building was close to the pool area. Although we were no longer wet and didn’t have the videotapes anymore. The walls were smooth and painted an aqua or light blue. Shortly, we saw a co-worker. She usually wears glasses but did not have them on. She was leaning against the wall and another woman was standing maybe six feet in front of her, facing her.

Jill was making taunting gestures and snickering. From the looks of it, Betsy didn’t know she was being taunted. She couldn’t see it.

Then Jill placed a ketchup packet about two or three feet in front of Betsy and told her to get it. Without her glasses, she couldn’t see it and had to bend down to feel for it. Jill started laughing and stopped down to taunt Betsy some more, although I don’t remember specific words. I knew what was going on more by facial expressions and actions than by words.

While Betsy was on the ground searching for the ketchup packet, Jill ripped open several other ketchup packets and placed them at the knees of Betsy, so that Betsy knelt in them, getting ketchup all over her knees. I knew this was wrong and wanted to help. But I’m not sure if I did anything more than helping her up, perhaps helping to get the ketchup off her and giving Jill a stare of some sort.

During this whole time many people were passing by and glancing at what was going on, although nobody stopped.

Scene III: I had had enough of Jill’s taunting of Betsy, even though I am not very close to Betsy. I was back in the pool area, although this time there was a large open area that was where the pool had been. It was a like a huge public square. Hundreds of people were walking in many directions through the square. I was by myself. But as I started walking toward the other side, where the stadium-like building still stood, I saw my friend and three policemen walking toward me.

I thought “Great, my friend has told the police what happened and they will deal with Jill.” As I got about halfway across the square when I saw Jill. She was looking at me and had a nasty smirk on her face. I started to pass her and she reached out with both hands and pushed me, laughing. I was more determined than ever to talk to the police about Jill’s actions that afternoon.

When I got to the police and my friend, I said something like “I’m glad to see you.” And one of them asked if I was Paul Hoffman. I said yes and that officer immediately brought out handcuffs and slapped them around my wrists and telling me I was arrested.

I immediately woke up, trying to figure out why I had been arrested when all I was doing was trying to help someone. I also realized that my friend had handcuffs on, too.

I didn’t want to go back to sleep until I found an answer to this question. In a moment, I decided that Jill had gotten to the police first and lied to them, saying that I had harassed her in some way. I was angry with Jill, but in a few more moments, I figured out that when this matter came before a judge, there would be hundred of witnesses to what had happened and I would be exonerated.

Finally, at peace with the thought that everything would work out OK for me in the end, I went back to sleep peacefully.

DUBLIN, September 25 (Compass Direct News) – The chief of Boukham village in Savannakhet province, Laos, on Friday (Sept. 19) called a special community meeting to resolve the “problem” of eight resident Christian families who have refused to give up their faith. The meeting concluded with plans to expel all 55 Christians from the village.

Although all adult members of a village are usually invited to such meetings, on this occasion the Christians were deliberately excluded, according to rights group Human Rights Watch for Lao Religious Freedom (HRWLRF).

Pastor Sompong Supatto, 32, and two other believers from the village, Boot Chanthaleuxay, 18, and Khamvan Chanthaleuxay, also 18, remain in detention in the nearby Ad-Sapangthong district police detention cell. HRWLRF earlier reported that police have held the men in handcuffs and wooden foot stocks since their arrest on Aug. 3, causing numbness and infection in their legs and feet due to lack of blood circulation. (See Compass Direct News, “Lao Christians Pressured to Renounce Faith.” Sept. 18.)

Authorities have said they will release the three only if they renounce their faith.

Pressure to Renounce Faith

When family members traveled to visit the detainees on Aug. 24, police officers deliberately tightened their restraints and told the families that this was the consequence of not renouncing their faith.

On Aug. 25, the village chief encouraged family members to apply for bail for the two teenagers but said Supatto did not qualify for bail, as his punishment for leading the Boukham church would be “life in prison.”

Three days later, the chief again pressured family members to sign documents renouncing their faith, but they refused.

Authorities initially arrested Supatto and four other believers from the Boukham church on July 20, detaining them for two days in a prison in nearby Dong Haen, according to HRWLRF sources.

Police stormed into the church that Sunday and ordered the 63 Christians present to cease worshiping or they would face arrest and imprisonment for “believing and worshiping God.”

When the Christians refused to comply, stating that Sunday was a Christian holy day and they must continue worshiping, the police arrested Supatto and two other church leaders identified only as Kai and Phuphet.

When the believers continued worshiping, police arrested a man identified only as Sisompu and a 17-year-old girl identified only as Kunkham. They detained all five in Dong Haen prison and charged them with spreading the gospel and holding a religious meeting without permission.

Although the Lao constitution “guarantees” freedom of religion and worship, church fellowships must be registered with government-approved institutions. Such registration comes with strict limitations on the activity of the church, however, and many Christians prefer not to register.

On July 22, three Christians approached the provincial religious affairs office in Savannakhet to challenge the arrests, asking how the five could be charged for “spreading the gospel” during a church worship service.

Officials then released the five on condition that they would cease holding worship meetings. They ordered them to seek permission from village authorities if they wanted to continue meeting together.

When the Christians continued to gather for prayer and worship, officials on Aug. 2 arrested a Christian villager identified only as Menoy, charging her with “believing in Jesus and worshiping God.”

The arrests of Supatto and two members of the Chanthaleuxay family followed on Aug. 3.  

Report from Compass Direct News

Looking for some last minute advice on who to put into your lineup? Aren't sure which flex player to choose? I'm here to drop some names of players I think will outperform or underperform general expectations. Here we go.

QB's to Start:

1. Jake Delhomme – I like Jake Delhomme this week. Even with Deangelo Williams and Jonathon Stewart the Panthers will be hard pressed to run on The Vikings…which means pass, pass, pass. Oh yeah, the Panthers get that Steve Smith guy back and he has something to prove.
2. J.T. O'Sullivan – The Lions are in a bad way defensively. They let a guy with 0 starts complete 10/13 passes with a long touchdowns. They let a guy with 1 start pass for 300 yards and 3 touchdowns. Sullivan proved he can put up numbers and he'll do it again this week.
3. Jon Kitna – And of course, Kitna will be out throwing the ball all over the place. The 49ers held both Hasselbeck and Kurt Warner to under 200 yards, but Warner was brutally efficient and Hasselbeck was throwing to guys we never heard of. This should be a high scoring affair.
4. Eli Manning – He's probably turning into a must start every week, but I figured I'd toss him on here anyway. Giants play the Bengals. Nuff said.

QB's to Sit:

1. Derek Anderson – Going into Baltimore with the team struggling, I think Derek Anderson will have another below average week. The good news for Anderson owners? They get the Bengals next week.
2. Carson Palmer – Bench Palmer until this team can prove they can do…well…anything. They are playing a Giants defense that seems to be feasting on poor teams and that trend will continue.
3. Tony Romo – Jason Witten will not be 100% and I really think the physical man coverage that Al Harris plays will check T.O. better than most. I see the Cowboys running the ball more this week and not putting up 40.
4. Matt Schaub - I like Schaub overall, but the Titans defense is playing as good as anyone. Let him ride pine one more week.

RB's to Start:

1. Maurice Jones-Drew – The Jaguars are going to be trying to keep Peyton Manning and company off of the field. Bob Sanders is out, and MoJo typically plays well against the Colts. He has 100 total yards and a TD this week.
2. Michael Turner – Run-DMC and Michael Bush are still prancing through the Chiefs secondary. Seriously, they went untouched for 10 yards on quite a few plays. Expect the same out of Turner.
3. Kevin Smith – The 49ers let Julius Jones run for 120+ yards despite knowing that the Seahawks passing attack was crippled. If the Lions coaching staff decides to run more than 10 times, Smith should have a good game.
4. Reggie Bush – I like Bush to be involved in a lot of aspects of the offense. The Broncos are going to put up points and the Saints will be looking for big plays to match. I say 100 total yards and a TD is very likely.

RB's to Sit:

1. Larry Johnson – Larry Johnson owners are looking to be in trouble. With the Chiefs being led by Tyler Thigpen, Johnson will see a lot of 8-9 in the box. Truthfully, for those that dumped a first round pick on the guy, I feel for you but it may be time to look for another starter and use LJ only for good matchups and only when Huard or Croyle come back.
2. Jonathon Stewart/Deangelo Williams – As I said before, I expect the Panthers to pass on the Vikings instead of trying to grind it out on a team that allowed 20 yards on 15 Joseph Addai carries. Stewart fans will be happy with their player this season…just not this week.
3. Earnest Graham – I love Graham. He's a tough guy and is averaging a bloated 8.3 YPC. However, the Bears stifled Joseph Addai and besides three runs that Jonathon Stewart broke, held the Panthers pretty well in check. Oh yeah. Jon Gruden for some reason has only gotten the ball into Graham's hands 25 times in two games.
4. Ricky Williams/Ronnie Brown – New England has been pretty tough on runners and the Dolphins running game hasn't been much to write home about.

    

WR's to Start:

1. Tory Holt – The Seahawks defense is better than numbers show, but if J.T. O'Sullivan can light it up with 36 year old Isaac Bruce, I think Holt can find some room. Marcus Trufant looked lazy and confused and was torched by Bruce despite the defense making O'Sullivan eat dirt all week.
2. Jerricho Cotchery/Lavernious Coles – The Chargers defense didn't convince me they could cover anyone after Jay Cutler, Brandon Marshall, and the Broncos lit them up. I think the absence of Shaun Merriman will give Favre the time he needs to find his talented guys downfield.
3. Lee Evans – If Tyler Thigpen can help a wideout get 90 yards against the Raiders, surging Trent Edwards should be able to get some balls to Lee Evans
4. Santonio Holmes – I think the Eagles will put up some points on the Steelers forcing them to throw. Asante Samuel should be able to help lock down Hines Ward leaving Holmes some chances to get the ball in his hands.

    

WR's to Sit:

1. Ocho Cinco and T.J. Housh – Along with Carson Palmer, I'm sitting these guys until they show me something.
2. Anthony Gonzalez – The Secret is out, Peyton Manning likes throwing to this guy. I think he'll draw more attention than Marvin Harrison this week, leaving the veteran to reap the benefits from the passing game.
3. Braylon Edwards – A tougher than expected Ravens defense and Anderson's diminishing faith in his #1 wideouts ability to drop the ball tells me he sees fewer looks.
4. Roddy White – The only part of the Cheifs game that has looked ok is their pass defense. Despite the week 1 performance, the Falcons are still starting a rookie QB, and Michael Turner romping all over the field will result in fewer looks for the wideout.

    

TE's to Start:

1. Tony Schaeffler – The Broncos offense is rolling, as is Shaeffler. I'd start him over Gonzales this week.
2. Owen Daniels – With Schaub facing a good pass rush by the Titans, he's not going to have time to get downfield. I expect him to check down to Daniels quite a few times.

TE's to Sit:

1. Tony Gonzales – Ok, the guy is hard to sit, but I can't stress the problems with the Chiefs offense enough. If you have another legitimate options (Which probably isn't likely) sit Gonzo.
2. Greg Olson – Olson's two fumbles in two catches has to have the Bear's confidence waning. Olson is a high round pick, but Tight End looks might go to Desmond Clark as this point.

DUBLIN, September 18 (Compass Direct News) – Confronted with evidence of rights abuses yesterday, an official in Champasak province, Laos, said district officials had “misunderstood” religious freedom regulations when they arrested and detained two men for converting to Christianity, according to Human Rights Watch for Lao Religious Freedom (HRWLRF).

District police officers in cooperation with the chief of Jick village in Phonthong district arrested Khambarn Kuakham and Phoun Koonlamit on Sept. 8, accusing them of “believing in Christianity, a foreign religion,” HRWLRF reported.

Both men were placed in criminal detention for five days and ordered to renounce their faith, the Lao Movement for Human Rights (LMHR) confirmed.

Officials warned Kuakham that he had violated the terms of his employment by having contact with Christians and converting to the Christian faith. He must renounce his faith in order to return to his teaching position, they said. If he refused, he would face a lengthy detention.

When challenged by local Christians, the head of Champasak province’s National Front for Reconstruction – a religious affairs body – claimed that according to a government decree issued in 2002 the men should have sought prior approval to convert. The Decree on Management and Protection of Religious Activities states that if there were no Christians in a village prior to the Communist takeover in 1975, potential converts in the village or town must seek permission to convert to Christianity.

Local Christians argued that since Kuakham attended worship services in another village with an existing Christian presence, he had not violated the decree.

They also pointed to Article 3 of the same decree, which states that “all Lao citizens are equal before the law in believing or not believing religions as provided by the Constitution and laws of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic.”

The official then said district authorities had “misunderstood” the situation, and that he would caution them to respect the believers’ freedom to worship.

Still, the men were released after five days with the understanding that if they continued to practice their faith, then they would be arrested and detained again. At press time, Kuakham was back in his teaching position and had no intention of renouncing his faith.

Christians Held in Stocks

In Boukham village, Savannakhet, three Christians remain in detention for their faith, HRWLRF reported yesterday. Officials have kept pastor Sompong Supatto, 32, Boot Chanthaleuxay, 18, and Khamvan Chanthaleuxay, 18, in handcuffs and foot stocks since their arrest on Aug. 3, causing considerable pain.

Released from the stocks only for toilet breaks, both Boot Chanthaleuxay and Khamvan Chanthaleuxay were suffering from loss of feeling and infection in their legs and feet due to lack of blood circulation.

Supatto, who had been nursing a sick family member before he was detained, learned last week that the family member had died. Despite hardships caused to the family, both Supatto and his wife are adamant that they will not forsake Christianity.

Authorities have said they will release the men only if they renounce their faith.

Livestock Seized

Several sources have confirmed that authorities are still targeting Tah Oih tribal Christians in Saravan province.

On Sept. 8, provincial and district authorities held a meeting in Katin village, claiming the Lao central government had ordered them to do so in response to international inquiries about religious freedom abuses in the village. Officials talked to leaders and residents about the 2002 decree and asked all parties to respect the religious laws of the nation, HRWLRF reported on Tuesday (Sept. 16).

They also cautioned Christians that their right to faith would stand only if they cooperated with village activities and if they were not bribed or paid to believe in Christianity.

On Friday (Sept. 12), however, village authorities seized a buffalo belonging to a Christian villager identified only as Bounchu and informed him that the animal would only be returned if he renounced his faith. The buffalo, worth about US$350 and vital for agricultural activity, was a prized family asset.

When Bounchu refused, officials on Saturday (Sept. 13) slaughtered the buffalo in the village square and distributed the meat to all non-Christian families in the village. They also warned all Christian residents that they would continue to take possession of their livestock until they renounced their faith.

Residents of Katin village had earlier killed a Christian villager on July 21. Officials arrested a total of 80 Christians on July 25 and detained them in a local school compound, denying them food for three days in an attempt to force the adults to sign documents renouncing their faith. (See Compass Direct News, “Authorities Arrest 90 Christians in Three Lao Provinces,” Aug. 8.)

More Intervention

Several aspects of the 2002 decree need to be addressed, a spokesman from HRWLRF told Compass today.

“From this and other incidents of persecution in Saravan and Savannakhet provinces, it appears that district and local authorities have been misinterpreting the decree, either intentionally or in ignorance,” he said.

International advocacy efforts were helpful in addressing these issues, he added. For example in Champasak, there was some evidence that provincial officials were embarrassed by negative publicity generated over the arrest of Kuakham and Koonlamit.

The LMHR issued a press release on Sept. 10 pointing to an upsurge in arrests and religious freedom abuses in Laos and calling for intervention from international governments and Non-Governmental Organizations.

Report from Compass Direct News

As soon as my wedding ring is seen, some people take it upon themselves that it is their business whether or not I have intercourse with my husband! These are random people who I have never met before and just happen to see one day in public, the majority of the time. Some people ask, in what their opinion must be diplomatic asking "do you have a normal life with your husband?" others are more fothcoming and ask outright "you're married....but being disabled you will never have had sex with your husband, have you?" or a variation of either phrases - along with anything inbetween the two extreemes.

Things couldn't be further from reality. Rumour has it that Catholic Girls are filthy girls in the bedroom, so add into the mix that sex for this girl is supposed to be taboo...and you have yourself a very raunchy cocktail!

Sex as a cripple isn't greatly different from sex as an ablebodied person. Some things are a little tricky, somethings are near impossible and other things are pretty much the same as they ever were. I have a huge sex drive and actually depend on sex to help control my pain. I adore being dominated on occasion, - no fluffly pink handcuffs for me though - I much prefer the hardcore leather ones, thick chunky leather bonding my wrists together while I'm at the mercy of my lover. I love oral sex, both giving and taking and to 69 with him ontop of me, is just pure sexual bliss! Equally as much as I enjoy being dominated, I also enjoy being in a dominatrix role, the power, the control, my lover being at my mercy... Disabled women can be sexy, just as much as ablebodied women!

So...I may not have complete use of my body, but that doesn't mean I'm no longer a naughty, horny bitch!

Models: Bambi Graves and Vendetta Vain
Make-up: Rachel I
Ropes and cuffs: Cuffkey
Assisted by: Siobhan
Also posted on Flickr and deviantART
See more on Flickr, MySpace, Livejournal and ViolentlyBeautiful.com
Buy prints on deviantART and Fotki

DUBLIN, August 28 (Compass Direct News) – The chief of Boukham village in Savannakhet province, Laos today ordered the families of three detained Christians to sign documents renouncing their faith. Human Rights Watch for Lao Religious Freedom (HRWLRF) reported that the family members refused.

A crackdown in other parts of Laos continued, with new incidents reported this week in Attapue and Borikhamxay provinces. On Monday (August 25), the chief of Donphai village in Attapue province summoned believers and fined them for holding a church service during local animistic ceremonies.

In Borikhamxay province, officials continued to pressure 22 Christian families comprising 150 people in Toongpankham village who have refused to give up their faith. Village officials had torn down their church building in January, then in mid-August harassed church members for not meeting in a proper worship facility.

In the incident in Boukham village in Savannakhet province, the chief summoned the families of two detained Christians, identified by the single names of Boot and Khamsavan, and ordered them to travel to the police station where the two were being held to sign affidavits renouncing their faith; the family members refused, according to HRWLRF.

Police detained Boot and Khamsavan, along with their pastor Sompong, on August 3. (See Compass Direct News, “Authorities in Laos Detain 90 Christians,” August 8.)

The family members had already traveled to Ad-Sapangthong police station on Sunday (August 24) to visit Boot, Khamsavan and Sompong. When they arrived at the detainment cell at that time, officials tightened the handcuffs and wooden stocks restraining the hands and feet of the prisoners, causing severe pain.

“This is the consequence of not signing documents to renounce your faith,” a police official told the visitors. “We’ve already given you three opportunities to do this, but you have refused.”

On Monday (August 25), after the visitors returned home, the village chief instructed them to immediately apply for bail for Boot and Khamsavan but said Sompong did not qualify for it, as his punishment for leading the church would be “life in prison.”

Fine Imposed for Worshiping

In Donphai village, Sanamchai district of Attapue province, the village chief summoned Christians on Monday (August 25) and fined them for holding a worship service the previous day while villagers carried out animistic ceremonies.

The village chief charged them with violating his order to refrain from worship that particular day and imposed a fine of 700,000 Lao kip (US$83), one pig, and a pot of rice wine. He also said the church would be held responsible if any of the villagers became ill as the result of “spirits” being offended by their worship.

At press time the Christians had refused to pay the penalty, despite threats of more serious consequences if they failed to do so. They have also decided to continue their weekly worship services, in accordance with freedoms guaranteed in the Lao constitution.

In Toongpankham village, Burikan district of Borikhamxay province, officials in mid-August scolded 22 Christian families – a total of 150 people – for holding church services in a private home.

Summoning church leaders to a meeting at government offices, officials demanded that they meet in a church building. The Christians asked how this was possible, since officials had torn down their church building in January. When they sought permission to rebuild, officials refused.

According to HRWLRF, believers have since continued to meet in the home of church member Chiang Yui, determined to express their freedom of worship as provided in the Lao constitution.  

Report from Compass Direct News

'I want you to completely give yourself over to me.' 

I pause, then decide I'm up to the challenge. He knows I find it hard to completly relinquish any control I might have. To let someone else call the shots. But who knows, I might enjoy it. Besides, he has a glint in his eye; I can't resist finding out what he's planning. 

He tells me to take my clothes off. He's seen me naked plenty of times, but I can't help but feel vulnerable and a little self conscious as he sits there watching me.

I question the fairness of this, how come he gets to keep all his clothes? He reminds me of our agreement, and orders me to lie face-down on his bed.

He has a black metal headboard, with poles to support it. It's always given me ideas, but we never did anything. Now I find myself handcuffed to it, my arms stretched out. He straddles me lightly, his weight resting on my thighs. Surprisingly, I'm quite comfy. 

He moves my hair gently off my back and twists it round to one side. He does it slowly, running his hands through it, making sure my neck and back are unobstructed. It gives me shivers.

He runs his hands over my lower neck and shoulder blades, before pausing briefly to add massage oil. Firmly he runs his hands all over my back and neck. Before long, I'm biting my lip to hold back moans. I can almost hear him smile at my response as he leans forwards with his hands on my lower back and slowly kisses my neck. 

Unable to help myself, I let a moan loose as he buries his head further into my neck, stimulating me with his tongue, lips and teeth. I can feel his hard penis pressing into my back as he leans over me, his hands running up and down my sides, and one of them reaching round to feel my breast. I press my face into a pillow, gasping. 

His other hand reaches between my legs, making me gasp again with surprise. He runs his hand over my sex, finding it wet and swollen. I grip the bars of the bed as his hand moves over my clitoris, barely bothering to stifle my moans any more. 

Suddenly, his weight lifts off me, I feel cold and alone. He kisses all down my back to the top of my buttocks to reassure me of his presence. I hear the rustle of clothes being removed, and the groan of a zip as he removes his jeans. He hasn't left me untouched for long, but that time has allowed me to return from the fringes of orgasm. His weight rests itself on top of me once again. His hands briefly stretch up and grab my wrists, fondling the handcuffs, checking that I'm still secure. 

His hard, warm cock rests on my buttocks, but now he repositions himself, gently spreading my legs with his hands, and entering me from behind. 

A cry of passion escapes me, and I grasp the chains binding me to the bed. 

His thrusts are slow but deep, he pulls all the way out before entering me again. I cry out every time his penis enters me, his hands running all over my back, sides, and ocasionaly moving to my chest to stimulate my nipples. 

It isn't long before I start to feel the orgasm grow inside me, my body tensing in response to his movements. I can hear his breathing become faster and deeper in my ear, his hands snake up my body to cover my wrists again, his lips once more at my neck between desperate breaths.

I can't contain it any more. My body tenses up in passion and I let out the loudest cry yet. He's almost there as well, I can tell by the thrusts becoming faster and more urgent. I tilt my head up towards his, letting him know its ok. Our lips meet. He draws away quickly, and comes inside me as I convulse again. 

Climax takes over both of our bodies. We move together, urgently. We each need this as much as the other.

Some days the beauty will just not let up. Special thanks to my traveling companions for indulgently letting me stop the car AGAIN on those sweet days.

You can see what we did on our summer vacation here.

So, here's what happened:

On August 4^th, in La Marque, Texas, 28-year-old Kathryn "Kristi" Fridge went with her mother to the local Walmart (FM 1764 and Interstate 45) with her mother and 2-year-old daugter to get supplies in preparation for impending Tropical Storm Eduardo.

She went over to buy batteries, but there were none left.  Fridge told reporters, "I was like, 'Dang.'  I looked at my mom and said, 'They're all f***ing gone.'"

Captain Alfred Decker, the La Marque assistant fire marshal (certified by the state of Texas as firefighter, peace officer, fire investigator and fire inspector) came up to her in uniform, and told her, "You need to watch your mouth" (quote from Fridge).

Fridge told reporters, "I was like, 'Oh, OK.  Sorry?'"

Decker ordered Fridge to follow him to his car, because that was where his citation book was, but she protested.  She eventually listened, but as he led her to his car, she yelled to some on-lookers, "Can you believe this?  He's f***ing arresting me for saying 'f***'!"

She later told reporters, "When I got outside, I saw he was a fire marshal — I saw his car.  I said, 'You're not even a cop!'  He said,  'I can do this.'"

Decker then asked for her name, and she spelled it out both verbally and in sign language (according to her - Decker hasn't commented because there's a pending court case).  She said that this angered him and he handcuffed her.

But La Marque Fire Chief Todd Zacherl said that because Fridge made a scene, Decker was forced to act.  He told reporters, "She cussed him, she cussed everybody. By now, we have a huge group of people looking."  Fridge denies this saying that she never cursed at Decker.  Her mother (Kathryn Rice, from Santa Fe) backed up her story, saying, "She never got nasty with him; she never cussed at him."

Zacherl went on to say that Decker handcuffed her for his own safety, because Fridge was being belligerent and Decker had to turn his back to get his citation book and run her name to see if she had any warrants.

Fridge was then ticketed for disorderly conduct (a Class C misdemeanor) and then released.

On August 7^th, Fridge went to the La Marque Fire Department to speak with Zacherl, and she took forms to file an official complaint, but as of last week had not filed the papers yet.

She told reporters, "I'm not out to sue or get money—I just want them to drop this ticket.  Yes, I probably shouldn't have cussed in public, but he took it way too far."

Zacherl disagreed, saying, "When you're in uniform, you have to uphold the laws.  It's like if he was on the way home and saw a drunk driver—he had to act."

Personally, I think the fire marshal was perfectly in the right here.  He handcuffed her for his own safety.  He didn't arrest her, he detained her.  This is a common practice that police officers use to ensure their safety.  It was HER who caused the scene, not him.  It was either handcuff her or call for back-up (which would mean calling the police department, since it's not the fire marshal's job to back somebody up like that).

As for the legality of the ticket, it's perfectly within Texas law.  You can't go around swearing.  The public as a whole has decided that they do not want profanity allowed in public (they did this by electing the officials who put that law into practice, and have not disagreed with that law by passing a citizen sponsored initiative to overturn it).

This was done in a public place where there are children who don't need to be subjected to profanity.  I know little 3-year-olds who go around using the f-word because their parents just curse whenever they want to.

This isn't a violation of free speech.  I can't go up to a little 4-year-old and say, "Hey you little f****er!" so saying it within hearing distance of anybody else violates that principle of "breach[ing] the peace".

On the radio show that I heard the story on, there was a caller who said she should file assault charges, since he touched her without her consent.  He is a certified officer, and has an obligation to uphold the law.  While upholding the law, he is exempt to some degree from assault charges.  He didn't abuse her, he handcuffed her.  Criminals can't sue cops for touching them as they are handcuffed, and this case is NO different.

The fact that there was an outcry because of this (although most reaction was in the fireman's favor) shocks me.  Where is our sense of law and order?  There's a difference between civil liberties and anarchy, but the two are beginning to become confused in the minds of many Americans.

Done Ranting,

Ranting Republican
:: :: :: :: ::

The Supreme Court of Brazil (STF) has ruled that the police can only use handcuffs if the prisoner is thinking about escaping or committing a violent crime. :-)  The police can't abuse the use of handcuffs.

This all started a few weeks back when a convicted murder appealed saying his being handcuffed during his trial was abusive.  Soon afterwards two high profile arrest were made of men - one a rich businessman and the other the ex-Mayor of São Paulo - charged with financial crimes.  Both were photographed handcuffed.   The Chief Justice said this had to be debated to protect "human dignity".

The Supreme Court here is much more "hands-on".

The PF (Federal Police) are not happy with this court decision, but are trying to establish procedures based on the court's ruling.

Just another day in Paradise.

And away we go:

rape movie, Boner, tits, pussy, rod, shaft, penis, dick, dong, hog, cock, balls, testicles, juggs, ass, anus, anal, butthole, cameltoe, panties, nipples, boobs, hummer, blowjob, bj, suck, lick, tongue, gag, fuck, fucking, sex, schoolgirl, cheerleader, jenna jameson, leah luv, ron jeremy, peter north, long dong silver, hooker, whore, slut, nympho, skank, BDSM, sado masochism, fetish, free porn, free porn movies, free porn download, free sex, hot teen, hot coeds, hot milf, hot gramma, hot for teacher, gangbang, orgy, track lighting, smoking jacket, perversion, forbidden sex, wet, juicy, cans, hot carl, angry dragon, dirty sanchez, cleveland steamer, doggystyle, piledriver, reverse cowgirl, union of the monkey, 69, feet, foot fetish, hairy fetish, smoking fetish, balloon fetish, beastiality, zoophilia, latex, buttplug, dildo, vibrator, masturbation, handcuffs, loonies, looners, furries, penetration, insertion, virgin, virginity, pee, pissing, piss, urine, ejaculation, squirt, squirting, cumming, gushing, man goo, semen, sperm, giz, facial, golden shower, clown porn, midgets, midget sex, amputee sex, bondage, torture, medical fetish, hentai and farting on cakes (yes thats a real thing)

Thats all I can think of. Now lets watch those ratings soar...

I like this quote - don't forget it - because if they can get to someone who is in the public eye - they/them can get to you - (Why else does the government go to Hollywood for ideas on "how to/would you" do??)

Bernie Mac: "Now everyone telling me what I CAN'T do, what I CAN say, what I SHOULD do, and asking, `Are blacks gonna be mad at you? Are whites gonna accept you?'"

At least he spoke up and did --

i moaned T2's name for years, in fantasy and in real life. basically, with any fantasy in which more domination than spanking is involved, i can't imagine anyone but T2. he really got a firm (heh.) handle on my psychology and exploited every filthy little crevice of it. he knew exactly how to humiliate me, when to make me beg, how to make me dirty talk, how to make me feel the most helpless. we also knew each other enough that he could do things like drag me across the floor, leave bite marks on me, and literally throw me onto floors and beds. he didn't like the whole S/M "look"... he was never that into collars, and we only used handcuffs once*. he preferred to overpower me through brute force, and when he tied me up it was usually with his belt. i don't know of any more erotically twisted action than seeing a guy take off his belt so that he can strap your hands to the bed. it's a really kinky thing if you think about it; a bondage restraint that men carry around with them all the time, and which bars the way to the crotch - add to that a whiff of paternal punishment. makes me wet just thinking about it.

this total understanding of my psychology, combined with an almost scientific understanding of my body, and he could make me wet my thighs with just a touch and a look.

for the past fewish months, i've been masturbating to mark and his drool-worthy cock. the fact that he's admitted to me that he likes the idea of humiliating a girl in bed, and the moderately dominating things that he's done, have extended his stay in my fantasy world. in terms of psychology, he has an almost perfect combination of sensitivity and indifference. he's sensitive enough to have wanted me to be sober when i stripped for him. but not so into it that he tried very hard/at all at foreplay. there was also the smug factor - mark's not like, a really obvious pimp or anything, but he has a way with girls and flirts a lot. so seeing other girls be attracted to him, particularly She of the Fake Meow (my virulent hatred of her remains inexplicable, even to myself), served as a turn-on, because i'd look at them and think, "girl, let me tell you a story. there is a notch on my bedpost, and it has his name written all over it. and know what? it was fucking glorious. have you seen that cock? okay no - what i meant was: have you felt it? mmm-HMM." in the case of She of the Fake Meow, there would be this additional post-script: "i have more kink in my little finger than you have in all of your pubic hair."

while on the subject of indifference, i think it's a function of my essential love for submission that makes me fantasize about being used/ignored. there was this really funny fantasy i used to indulge in about brian that involved him using me for sex** and then feeling so weird about it that he couldn't face me in real life and stopped talking to me until he wanted more sex, making it actually more insensitive than if he'd just used me for sex as a stranger..... which is hilarious because that's what he did.

that bit of snarkery aside, i really did have fantasies about being the little wife. there's this one strange fantasy i have that i only used once because it made me laugh out loud in bed. it involved being the girlfriend of brian (this fantasy also works with mark as the protagonist) at some point in the future, when they're both richass businessmen. in my fantasy, they are engaged in some sort of manly activity together (my fantasy is unclear on this), like... watching sports or, uh, playing video games or something. whatever it is, it involves cigar-smoking and copious amounts of beer-drinking. there are also other guys, probably their manly beer-drinking businessmen co-workers. the entire gist of the fantasy is that while they are doing that, i'm like, bringing them beer or nachos or whatever, and besides throwing mildly misogynistic comments my way, and a half-hearted grope from brian, they're all entirely ignoring me. and this whole situation, for whatever reason, gets me fucking horny. so that hours later (baseball games take a long time. who knew?), when he'd drunkenly stumble onto me in bed and start molesting me in the hopes of a sleazy fuck to cap off the night, i'd open up my legs, fucking hungry for it.

i ask of you - is this kinky or just fucked up? mind you, i think if a guy actually treated me like this, i'd get really mad. but i also think if a guy actually dragged me into the back of a car and raped me, i'd be terrified and traumatized. that's why it's fantasy, no?

i have, on average, about 10 unique fantasies a day. i am what my psych AP book called a "daydream-prone personality." this is especially true right now, when my body is in baby-making overdrive. everything provokes a fantasy. during dinner today with my grandparents at a japanese restaurant, i started thinking that undressing from a kimono must be pretty damn hot. all those layers. then i started thinking of how mark and brian both have taken japanese. then i thought, i could easily learn kinky phrases in japanese. i wonder when i'll be able to use that japanese schoolgirl uniform? and my filthy mind went off on a happy little lark about getting fucked in a capsule hotel.

but back to mark. right now mainly i fantasize about how his cock fills my mouth (and then some a good amount), and how he came all over me (and how much). and that face he makes. and his spanking. augh, praise the gods of kink, the spanking. he's not a bad subject for fantasizing, although i still can't get him into more brutal roles.

the issue is this: i haven't seen or talked to him for a long while. i'm pretty sure that he stopped thinking about me around the time that he got back from europe. that's okay. but i feel a little weird fantasizing about him. there was a time when he'd take it as a compliment that when my fevered brain tells me to moan a name, most of the time it's his. i don't know if he still would.

yet... if he doesn't star in my fantasies, then who will? it's hard for me to have an amorphous, faceless person fucking me senseless in my head. i gather that a lot of guys jerk off just imagining the act of sex, and don't much think about a specific person. but i can't.

whatever. it hurts no one if various fantasy-versions of mark run around in my mind doing unspeakable things. maybe it'll somehow telepathically positively influence his sexual karma - as if he needs it.

* i have only this to say: there is a reason they make padded handcuffs. the metal chafes, and while i'm all for having semi-permanent marks of sexual flagrancy on my body, having red chafing around both wrists is hard to hide and just a tad too obvious.

** here, by "sex" i mean as close to sex as his cute catholic ass would allow. which is surprisingly far.

This decision was made after a construction worker, condemned for 13 years as a murderer, sued the State because he was kept handcuffed throughout his entire trial. This case got to the Supreme Court and served as a base for this new rule.

At a first glimpse, some may say the Supreme's decision is ok. That's surely not my opinion.

I'm a law student and I have no shame in saying that I feel sorry for the brazilian law system. In order to understand the true meaning of this new rule, we must remember that recently some important figures, like bankers and politicians, have been arrested by our Federal Police.

Actions of the Fed's have a singular characteristic, which, by the way, I'm not a fan. Almost all of them are previously leaked to TV stations so that, at the moment of the arrests, cameras are able to capture every moment of the action.

Surely that's not appropriate, but well, It's also not something that keeps the Federal Police from doing it's job! If you want to know, Fed's here in Brazil actually work. Big fishes are taken to jail everyday.

The problem is that these fishes are thrown back into the ocean in a day or two because our justice system sets them free. And, because of all that media coverage, the system has also taken the cuffs away from criminals.

Imagine if a politician or a really rich banker can be seen on TV handcuffed? Of course not!

It's a shame. Definitely, a shame.

I was surfing the tubes of the internets today and I ran across a search engine that will find criminal records on some individuals, for free.

Anyone can access this information and you can find records for something as minor as a traffic violations, to sex crimes. Not only will it give you the case number, but also the full name and address of the perpetrator, in a Google Map format.

At first, I thought this was really cool as I started looking for people I went to high school with. I had heard stories about some of them being arrested or being in jail.  I reveled in the fact that if anyone had some dirt on them, I could potentially dig it up. I did find a few folks I went to high school with. Three of the four that I found were married, two had kids. But then I thought, what if I found a member of my family here?

I'm sure someone, somewhere in my family had gotten in trouble with the law once upon a time. I have a particular cousin who I would be surprised not to find on this site.  I nervously typed the name of my father- what if there was a chance he harbored some dark secret that even I didn't know about?

A million different scenarios raced through my brain, 99.9% of which didn't have a snowball's chance in hell of being true. Did I really want to know? What would I do if I found out something horrible about my own family? Why am I so curious?

I hit search...

Nothing.

I quickly searched for my sister, and again thankfully found nothing. None of my family turned up in a search result, not even the cousin. I did find a previous employer....a "criminal" record for going 65 in a 45.  Those "criminals" were everywhere I found. Their pinpoints littered the map like ants on an anthill. Every now and then I would find an icon for a person who had a drug related crime, even fewer violent crime offenders, and I only found one sex crime offender- 132 miles away in a rural part of the state (probably the only part of the state they would let her, yes her, live).

So, I put the link in your hands for you to tell me what you make of it. Here's the link, post your comments below.

http://www.criminalsearches.com/default.aspx