Most of the time, the churches are the ones who cast these pregnant women out in the dark because they are not prefect ( example: having sex without being marry at 14th). It does not made sense. Do anyone go to the doctor when he or she is well? So do you go to church when you are perfect? There would be no need for religion if everyone was perfect. Most of these problems are in mega churches for you can get lost in one of those places. These mega churches are around because most will look around first before they join a church. Most people do not go to the church in their neighborhood anymore. So churches have became politically. So if you are a conservator then you go to a conservative church. If you are a liberal then you go to a liberal church. It is like we can't get along with others who are different. It is like we are not living up to the standard of our religion.

Growing up in a Christian family, I was told about the I, me, and my test. The test is If you had I, me, and my in your sentence then you was thinking about yourself and not others. For being a Christian is not about pleasing yourself but God. The church communities have became a lot of self interests instead of helping others in need. I am not roofing in my church community but in my school community for that is a place when I can help others. I have a three year old girl and a two year old boy who make it hard for me to service in my church community. Like I said church community are so politically to the point that if my kids did kids stuff I would get the look (other parents thinking, "she is a horrible parent."). So I am very active in my student organization while I am at school and my kids are in child care.

This story by Angela Careless of the Daily Mail makes me want to vomit.

You know what?

If I were gang raped in the back of a moving van by three men and made pregnant, and if I gave birth to that baby and became a mother, and if my rapists were not apprehended by the time my baby was 22 months old, I would not - and I mean this truly - I would NOT be putting my PHOTOGRAPH along with my MOTHER’S photograph atop my pro-life rape story indicating my GENERAL GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION in the INTERNATIONAL press.

For health and safety of my baby and myself, I would not do this.

What kind of family was this child-of-rape born into exactly? SOMETHING ain’t right.

CNN Coverage

Alan Keyes on Hannity and Colmes Discussing Obama's Voting Record in Illinois Legislature

An even more informative article documenting Obama's position, filled with dates and quotes can be found at: http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2008/01/top-10-reasons.html

Before I am accused on "using" the abortion issue to galvanize people who may read the article or be close to me, I would simply state, as has been stated by respected Pastor/Theologian John Piper, that I find it even more difficult to vote for a pro-abortion candidate as I would a stated racist or bigamist (http://www.desiringgod.org/ResourceLibrary/Articles/ByDate/1995/1524_OneIssue_Politics_OneIssue_Marriage_and_the_Humane_Society/):

One-Issue Politics, One-Issue Marriage, and the Humane Society

Investigating dog life in Minnesota has solidified my decision to vote against those who endorse the right to abortion. So then what is my response to the charge of being a one-issue voter?

No endorsement of any single issue qualifies a person to hold public office. Being pro-life does not make a person a good governor, mayor, or president. But there are numerous single issues that disqualify a person from public office. For example, any candidate who endorsed bribery as a form of government efficiency would be disqualified, no matter what his party or platform was. Or a person who endorsed corporate fraud (say under $50 million) would be disqualified no matter what else he endorsed. Or a person who said that no black people could hold office—on that single issue alone he would be unfit for office. Or a person who said that rape is only a misdemeanor—that single issue would end his political career. These examples could go on and on. Everybody knows a single issue that for them would disqualify a candidate for office.

It's the same with marriage. No one quality makes a good wife or husband, but some qualities would make a person unacceptable. For example, back when I was thinking about getting married, not liking cats would not have disqualified a woman as my wife, but not liking people would. Drinking coffee would not, but drinking whiskey would. Kissing dogs wouldn't, but kissing the mailman would. And so on. Being a single-issue fiancé does not mean that only one issue matters. It means that some issues may matter enough to break off the relationship.

So it is with politics. You have to decide what those issues are for you. What do you think disqualifies a person from holding public office? I believe that the endorsement of the right to kill unborn children disqualifies a person from any position of public office. It's simply the same as saying that the endorsement of racism, fraud, or bribery would disqualify him—except that child-killing is more serious than those.

When we bought our dog at the Humane Society, I picked up a brochure on the laws of Minnesota concerning animals. Statute 343.2, subdivision 1 says, "No person shall . . . unjustifiably injure, maim, mutilate or kill any animal." Subdivision 7 says, "No person shall willfully instigate or in any way further any act of cruelty to any animal." The penalty: "A person who fails to comply with any provision of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor."

Now this set me to pondering the rights of the unborn. An eight-week-old human fetus has a beating heart, an EKG, brain waves, thumb-sucking, pain sensitivity, finger-grasping, and genetic humanity, but under our present laws is not a human person with rights under the 14th Amendment, which says that "no state shall deprive any person of life . . . without due process of law." Well, I wondered, if the unborn do not qualify as persons, it seems that they could at least qualify as animals, say a dog, or at least a cat. Could we not at least charge abortion clinics with cruelty to animals under Statute 343.2, subdivision 7? Why is it legal to "maim, mutilate and kill" a pain-sensitive unborn human being but not an animal?

These reflections have confirmed my conviction never to vote for a person who endorses such an evil—even if he could balance the budget tomorrow and end all taxation.

* * * This article is from A Godward Life, Book I: Savoring the Supremacy of God in All of Life by John Piper (Sisters, OR: Multnomah Publishers, 1997), pp. 279-280. Used with permission.

Fri, Jul 4, 2008

CLC

The 2008 Conservative Leadership Conference (CLC) announced today that Alan Keyes will be a speaker at the conference to be held in Las Vegas this September.

The former Assistant Secretary of State spent 11 years with the U.S. State Department. He served in the U.S. Foreign Service and on the staff of the National Security Council before becoming Ronald Reagan’s Assistant Secretary of State for International Organizations (1985-88). In the interim, from 1983 to 1985, Keyes served as ambassador to the United Nations Economic and Social Council, where he represented America’s sovereign interests in the U.N. General Assembly.

Keyes was President of Citizens Against Government Waste (1989-91) and founder of National Taxpayers’ Action Day. As the two-time Republican nominee for U.S. Senate in Maryland, he challenged liberal Democrats Paul Sarbanes (1988) and Barbara Mikulski (1992). Keyes was also a Republican presidential candidate in 1996 and 2000. His political views are consistently based on America’s founding ideals, those in the Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution.

Keyes hosted his own syndicated radio show throughout the 1990s, America’s Wake-Up Call, and a television commentary show, Alan Keyes is Making Sense, during 2002 on MSNBC. He is currently writing books and speaking publicly on America’s moral crisis.

Keyes has a Ph.D. in government from Harvard and wrote his dissertation on constitutional theory. He served as Interim President of Alabama A&M University in 1991. He speaks French and has studied Spanish, Russian, and ancient Greek, and is the author of Masters of the Dream: The Strength and Betrayal of Black America (1995); and Our Character, Our Future: Reclaiming America’s Moral Destiny (1996).

A pro-life champion, Keyes has unashamedly and consistently raised the standard of unalienable rights - and Biblical truth - in defense of the unborn. He confronts the culture of death with compelling and inspiring reasons why abortion must be banned from our land.

Keyes and his wife Jocelyn have three children: Francis, Maya, and Andrew. Alan’s stated purpose in life, like that of America’s Founders, is to provide a secure future for our posterity.

By Maureen

In this article from the Daily Mail, a 19 year old tells of her rape that occurred when she was 16. That rape left her pregnant, and against all the counsel she received (including her dad's), and against all worldly "logic," she chose to have the baby.

This is a fantastic article and a great story of inspiration . . . one that Planned Parenthood wouldn't be too happy about.

A victory! One woman and her husband came out of the abortion facility without having an abortion.  Thank you for your prayers.

If you would like to stand in prayer and silent protest, contact the Helpers of God’s Precious Infants: 309-453-7493

In January of 2005, an ambulance was called to one of George Tiller's clinics. The body of a 19 year old down syndrome woman was taken by that ambulance to a local hospital, but it was too late. She was dead before she ever left Tiller's clinic. (Please! No Sirens! was the plea of the clinic worker calling for an ambulance... those kinds of things draw too much attention, don't they?)

The clinic apparently showed considerable negligence when contacting EMS, claiming the patient was not in any serious, life-threatening danger, when in fact she had already gone into septic shock and was well on her way to death's door... she was in cardiac arrest and the person trying to revive her was performing CPR on a clinically dead patient.

Christin Gilbert is just one example of a women who went into an abortion clinic for an "elective" abortion who was irreversibly harmed by the abortion she "chose". One must note that Miss Gilbert, although 19 years old and considered an adult, had down syndrome and was considered incompetent and so her parents made the decision to abort her child. Unfortunately for the child, it was the product of a sexual assault. I'm sure the parents reasoned that the child's birth would have been too traumatic for their daughter.

One must also make a note (and highlight it in very florescent yellow ink) that in order to do a late-term abortion as Tiller was once able to legally perform until the Supreme Court upheld a federal ban on them, the parents (or husband, friend, or other caretaker) are charged with the care of the individual (NOT a medical professional) in a hotel room for the entire three day abortion process, with the exception of the short period of time the patient is actually undergoing the direct "medical" procedures, such as the injection of a lethal substance into the heart of the pre-born "fetus", premature dilation of the cervix, and labor induction.

The facts in Christin's case show the flimsy logic of many pro-abortion proponents who argue that abortion should be allowed at any stage for the "health of the mother", claiming that if a woman's health is at stake, she should be able to get an abortion, even if the fetus is at a viable stage. This abortion was stamped big as day with an okay for health reasons. Perhaps Christin's loss is an acceptable one for them, but I doubt her poor parents felt the same way once it was all over.

Christin was healthy and had no other disorders or health issues other than being a down syndrome person. She was not in any immediate danger because of her pregnancy. The child's DNA was not tested to determine whether it would also have Down Syndrome... but even if it were tested, is a person's value based on whether or not they have Down Syndrome? Was Christin less valuable because of her condition? And WHY was this not NATIONAL NEWS considering the charges that have been leveled at Tiller and his clinics?

Read more about the details of this case at REAL CHOICE.

This incident gives new meaning to the term assigned to George Tiller by many pro-life workers... Tiller the Killer, and for this case especially, that unsavory moniker rings so very true.

[This is Miss Havisham, I have relinquished control of this blog this evening to my secretary Ms. Patrizzi. She has driven me to madness, in case you haven't noticed. She insisted, as a condition of her continued employment, that I allow her to post her insipid rantings to her relatives. These opinions do not reflect my own, or maybe they do. Don't tell her that! She must understand that I can fire her at will at anytime! I will! I will fire her. You'll see. I know I say that a lot but this time I mean it. I do. I do.]

This morning I received an email from a cousin of mine. He is running in the San Francisco Marathon. Great! The only thing is, he asked for donations to a charity for his efforts. Why isn't it just for him? I dig him. His charity is a little wierd. It's BirthChoiceTemecula.com. So, I looked into it. What a mindshaft!

Here is our email interchange from today:

Cousin writes:

I hope this email finds everyone in good spirits. As some of you may or may not know, I will be running my first Marathon (yes, all 26.2 miles of it) this Sunday in San Francisco. I just started running about 4 months ago and have since logged about 500 miles and feel great.

Not only will I be running for myself, but I will be running for a very worthwhile cause, Birth Choice Temecula www.birthchoicetemecula.com.

I would be extremely grateful for any support that you can give to help me raise funds for them. My personal fundraising site can be located at https://xxxxxxxxxxx. The online site will accept donations through next Sunday Aug 10^th.

Thank you for your support!!!!!!!

My response:

It sounds like you may not understand what Birth Choice of Temecula is about. It is unfortunate that you would try to take this moment away from me and reply to all with your misinformed views. As you mentioned, it was your opinion and probably should have been left at that.

Anyhoooooo, I won’t let that vibe affect my run as this is a very special moment for a special cause.

My response:

OneMom

Nota: Si el vídeo se ve es… gracias a Youtube. Si no se ve es… por culpa de Youtube.

...porque él, como persona, vale mucho.

Es mi sangre, es mi niño.

Si yo falto, ¿quién le va a dar la mano?

Mi amor por él es muy inmenso.

Me da mucho gusto que quieran a mi niño.

...porque es muy grande mi amor por él, porque lo adoro.

...yo tengo mucho corazón, mucho corazón para mi niño.

A ver si nos vamos enterando TODOS... pásalo.

.
Nos vemos.
.

Viene de:Héroes anónimos Alex Farnese | Más en este blog: Provida | Ironman: Team Hoyt |

.

Me encuentro, al intentar ver el vídeo (el que sustituía al censurado) que, al parecer, este también, igualmente, ha sido censurado. Esta vez directamente en Google vídeos... (amos de Youtube).
No tengo la certeza de que haya sido efectivamente censurado (a lo peor/mejor -siempre hay que pensar bien- es un problema técnico y transitorio...), pero, en cualquier caso y para no perder tiempo, lo vuelvo a subir.
NO ME VOY A RENDIR. Al fin y al cabo, los hipócritas que censuran y los partidarios del A-S-E-S-I-N-A-T-O de niños no nacidos, solo se están «jugando los cuartos» (o le hacen el trabajo sucio y cobarde a quienes se los «juegan») y yo, lo que me estoy «jugando» es el derecho de alguien a nacer, a vivir, a no ser BRUTALMENTE ASESINADO antes de nacer...

Aquí lo tienes, de nuevo, subido para que puedas ver, SIN CENSURA, cuál es la 'Dura Realidad' del aborto. ¿Qué quieren ocultar los que piden (y los que lo permiten o la practican) la censura de este vídeo?

[googlevideo=http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6910117723751127450]Nota: Si el vídeo se ve es… gracias a Google. Si no se ve es… por culpa de Google.

Míralo y pásalo.

Nos vemos.

addendum.- 04-08-2008________________

Según parece el vídeo alojado en Google (el que sustituía al de Youtube que sí, seguro, fue censurado) no había sido censurado. No se pudo ver durante una serie de días pero, repito, parece que no fue censura. Retiro lo dicho, por ahora, y pido disculpas. Aunque lo lamento, me alegra haberme equivocado.

.
Relacionados:
¿Dónde estás, mamá Chacón? | Youtube censura vídeo ¿Dónde estás mamá Chacón? | 
.

On Slice of Laodicea, Ingrid quoted Dr. Monica Miller in her article on what was found in their local abortion clinic dumpster. Here are two excerpts from Dr. Miller's comments as quoted on Slice:

“We are not going to be an organization promoting celibacy or chastity.”
Faye Wattleton, President, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Los Angeles Times, Oct. 17, 1986
_______

“If your parents are stupid enough to deny you access to birth control, and you are under 18, you can get it on your own. Call Planned Parenthood.”
Planned Parenthood advertisement, Dallas Observer, Jan. 30, 1986
_______

“There are only 2 basic kinds of sex: sex with victims and sex without. Sex with victims is always wrong. Sex without is ALWAYS right.”
You’ve Changed The Combination, Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood, Denver, Colo.
_______

“The question of whether or not to sell ourselves to men is a false one: The real question is how to sell ourselves in the way that is least destructive to ourselves and our sisters. Prostitutes don’t need our condescension. What they need is our alliance. And we need theirs.”
The New Our Bodies, Ourselves, Boston Women’s Health Collective, p 113
_______

“At Planned Parenthood you can also get birth control without the consent or knowledge of your parents. So, if you are 14, 15 or 16 and you come to Planned Parenthood, we won’t tell your parents you’ve been there. We swear we won’t tell your parents.”
Planned Parenthood employee lecturing students of Ramona High School, Riverside, Calif., April 21-22, 1986

And consider this investigative reporting piece. Their deception is appaling...

Our effort here to get the United Way to cut ties with Planned Parenthood will continue. It seems incogruous for an organization that claims to be so altruistic and noble to support one that is so destructive and deceptive. So far, our requests have fallen on deaf ears, but have received the attention of the local, state and national media. I encourage you to check out the giving practices of your local United Way, and work for the end of abortion.

The newspapers, and especially their columnists, are having a field day writing about Ozamis Archbishop Jesus A. Dosado's decision to deny Catholic politicians who are pro-abortion and pro-artificial contraception the Sacrament of Holy Communion. Some writers caution of a backlash, warning that decision appears too confrontational, and others seem sympathetic to the affected legislators, as if they were the underdogs. Some would even praise them for taking a principled stand.

But just how principled a stand is that of these politicians? And are the other considerations even relevant? Let's examine the situation at hand.

Integrity

We are all sinners and are guilty of not living up to all our beliefs. It would seem, however, that these Catholic politicians have radically disconnected their faith from their actions. They claim membership in a Church that emphatically teaches one very fundamental tenet, and then openly announce their support for -- and will work to bring about -- the opposite. It's one thing to be privately inconsistent with one's beliefs, but to do so repeatedly, publicly, without remorse, and to claim that it is right, is another thing altogether. It's a scandal.

What does that say about their integrity?

Here are the definitions of "integrity" from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary:

1: firm adherence to a code of especially moral or artistic values
2: an unimpaired condition
3: the quality or state of being complete or undivided

"Firm adherence" and "complete or undivided" all imply consistency in belief, word, and deed, don't they? To have integrity means to behave in accordance with declared and freely held belief.

It's obvious that these arrogant politicians want to have their cake and it it too. They want to advocate and pass coercive laws that promote and condone abortion and abortifacient contraceptives, while at the same time demand that they be considered Catholics in good standing!

What kind of chicanery is this? A Catholic "in good standing" is one who tries his best to follow the doctrines of the Catholic Church. What kind a Catholic is someone who refuses to believe in Catholic doctrine? Can such a person even be a Catholic except in name only? A How then, can one be in "good standing" with the Church when one promotes laws that are directly contrary to the Catholic doctrine?

Atty. Jose C. Sison, in his article "A bishop's courageous stand" (July 18, Philippine Star) hit the nail on the head when he wrote:

So Catholic politicians in Congress or in city councils who sponsored and supported these pro abortion measures should not complain if they are denied the Sacraments; or try to sway public opinion against the Church for their predicament. They "should have the integrity to acknowledge" that their stand is contrary to their Faith, and voluntarily refrain from receiving the Sacraments "until they have a change of heart", as Archbishop Dosado admonished.

Can we expect integrity from these politicians? If we cannot expect such, then why elect them? They will have their day of reckoning.

Common Sense

Dosado's decision is just plain common sense. Isn't a bishop supposed to defend the Catholic Faith and its moral teachings? Isn't abortion a very grave sin accoridng to Catholic teaching? Shouldn't a bishop decry the cold-blooded murder of the most innocent and helpless human beings -- the unborn? And doesn't the Church also treach that those who are in a state of mortal sin should refrain from receiving the Eucharist?

If the answe to these questions is "yes", then it seems quite obvious that Dosado's decison is a moral one, not a political or tactical move that must be calcualted to gain consensus. While we can normally expect a person who is conscious of being in a state of grave sin to refrain from receiving Communion,. someone who repeatedly continues to publicly oppose and violate catholic doctrine can hardly be expected to inhibit himself from Communion. After all, this would be an admission to himself that his action is wrong. It is a bishop's duty, therefore, to act on such a wanton display deception and disregard for Catholic doctrine by imposing a public restriction: denying them Communion. If a bishop were to turn a blind eye to this behavior, that would be an occasion of public scandal and damaging to the Faith and the flock.

It's integrity, again.

We need change

Let me repeat: It's all about integrity. These two-faced politicians got what they deserved. In fact, they didn't get enough retribution. They should be voted out of office.

We need politicians who will talk and act straight. We need integrity in our government. The Archbishop's courageous decision will help us in achieving that. We need more men like Archbishop Dosado.

"We are not going to be an organization promoting celibacy or chastity."
Faye Wattleton, President, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Los Angeles Times, Oct. 17, 1986
_______

"If your parents are stupid enough to deny you access to birth control, and you are under 18, you can get it on your own. Call Planned Parenthood."
Planned Parenthood advertisement, Dallas Observer, Jan. 30, 1986
_______

"There are only 2 basic kinds of sex: sex with victims and sex without. Sex with victims is always wrong. Sex without is ALWAYS right."
You've Changed The Combination, Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood, Denver, Colo.
_______

"The question of whether or not to sell ourselves to men is a false one: The real question is how to sell ourselves in the way that is least destructive to ourselves and our sisters. Prostitutes don't need our condescension. What they need is our alliance. And we need theirs."
The New Our Bodies, Ourselves, Boston Women's Health Collective, p 113
_______

"At Planned Parenthood you can also get birth control without the consent or knowledge of your parents. So, if you are 14, 15 or 16 and you come to Planned Parenthood, we won't tell your parents you've been there. We swear we won't tell your parents."
Planned Parenthood employee lecturing students of Ramona High School, Riverside, Calif., April 21-22, 1986

See the following related posts:

Reverend Larry Phillips blesses a new abortion clinic, declaring it "sacred and holy."

Planned Parenthood founder, Margaret Sanger, in her own words.

Racism rears its ugly head (yet again) at Planned Parenthood.

The ridiculous rantings of a pro-abortion supporter.

Great question . . . but don't expect an answer.

Why this woman works at planned parenthood.

Planned Parenthood propaganda cartoon.

What really happens in a D & E Abortion.

The silence is deafening.

Creation in the womb.

Survivors.

Life Chain 2008 is coming in just a few months! If you are near Peoria, ask your pastor if your church will be participating in this national event! You can call me at our church line for details - 309-387-2600

My answer would have been quite simple: "The same thing that happened to Susan Smith and Andrea Yates and the same thing if you were to murder my child."

If you want to know what the question was, you'll have to watch the video here.

MIKE WALLACE: What are your religious beliefs, Mrs. Sanger? Do you believe in God in the sense of a Divine Being -- who rewards or punishes people after death?

MARGARET SANGER: Well, I have a different attitude about--the divine--I feel that we have divinity within us, and the more we express the good part of our lives, the more the divine within us expresses itself.I suppose I would call myself an Episcopalian by religion and there's a--many other, if you travel around the world you get quite a bit of the feeling of all--all religions--have so much alike in the divine part of our own being. And I suppose you just couldn't just put that into a book or you couldn't put it to a phrase or a sentence.

WALLACE: Do you believe in sin -- When I say believe I don't mean believe in committing sin do you believe there is such a thing as a sin?

SANGER: I think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world--that have disease from their parents, that have no chance in the world to be a human being practically. Delinquents, prisoners, all sorts of things just marked when they're born. That to me is the greatest sin -- that people can -- can commit...

WALLACE: But sin in the ordinary sense that we regard it -- do you believe or do you not believe.

SANGER: What-what would they be?

WALLACE: Do you believe infidelity is a sin?

SANGER: Well, I'm not going to specify what I think is a sin. I stated what I think is the worst sin.

WALLACE: Yes, but then you asked me to say what--and I said what and ah--you refuse to answer me? 

SANGER: I don't know about infidelity, that has many personalities to it--and what a person's own belief is--you can't, I couldn't generalize on any of those things as being sins.

WALLACE: Murder is a sin...

SANGER: Well, I naturally think murder, whether it's a sin or not, is a terrible act.

Except the murder of millions of the unborn. What is amazing to me is that in the past 51 years many of Sanger's viewpoints have become mainstream.

Anyone ever hear of the frog in the kettle analogy? If you put a frog into a pot of boiling water, it will leap out right away to escape the danger.

But, if you put a frog in a kettle that is filled with water that is cool and pleasant, and then you gradually heat the kettle until it starts boiling, the frog will not become aware of the threat until it is too late.

The frog's survival instincts are geared towards detecting sudden changes. Perhaps ours are as well.

TMobile website compromised for much of the day;

Apple iphone software "fails";

wordpress is going to allow blogging from iphone to wordpress.

Now you may ask what these three events have in common and the answer would be that they provide a way for citizens to :communicate with other citizens by phone, by wireless services on their handset, by blog. What is it that the wicked dems fear the most? An educated people of the nation talking to other educated people of the nation, sharing intelligent ideas and reasons to vote for/not vote for a candidate.

If you do your homework, you will learn that in every country where socialism flourished even for a short period of time one of the most obvious efforts by that government was to control the language, presses, speech of the citizens. If you don't think so, then study Hitler, [fascism is to the left of socialism but both leftist governments], and Stalin's regime, [socialist] and Italy fascist state to this day practically [oh? you don't think so? How do you suppose they covered up those sodomite "priests"for decades?] And Krushchev's then; and Red China's and North Korea's to present. Remember there is a continuum of suppression of citizens rights that goes something like this:

communism-->totalitarianism-->fascism-->socialism/democracy [leftist regimes] | [moving to right :] Absolute Monarchy-->Constitutional Monarchy -->Republic-->no central government-->no organized form of government on any level, liberty of citizens to obey GOD's rules [necessitates a very disciplined and committed to GOD group of people to self-police].

Here are my questions?

Who is the dem candidate who votes BIG LABOR? BIG ABORTION? BIG BABY_KILLING_AND_PROCESSING_Plants?

Who is the dem candidate who changes his mind depending upon what day of the week it is?

Who is the dem candidate whose only plan for America's problems is smooth talk.

Who is the democratic/socialist Candidate?

Need I write his name here?

It is not an accident that a huge majority of the phones capable of blogging were disabled today because Ted Kennedy --that vile and ungodly and socialist man-- was back in the Senate to try to appear as the Saviour [which is always what the wicked do] as he was trying to save his own behind from being discovered by the FBI for hacking [or most likely using his political connections to achieve that through his ex-wife in the US Dept of Justice and the Pentagon]  into private computers, and passports, and bank accounts, spying on his opponents of his "fiefdom". 

America, wake up! Hitler was charismatic too, [according to news reports then of the parties he gave and the desire to please him by those with political and financial connections]; and so was Jim Jones, and many of the world's despots.

Here's another cluem America. In Denver where the keys to the Pepsi Center were delivered to the socialist ruling regime this past Monday, for the lavish blow-out to "celebrate", the Denver Housing Authority owned and controlled by City of Denver raised at least two people's rent exponentially [like about a 1000% increase] --people who are on very limited incomes of Social Security disability; and they stopped selling the discount RTD tickets at the RTD roundabout for the disabled, expecting them to pay full fare, because guess why? Denver is trying to raise $15 MILLION by the CON-vention to celebrate BIG WIG style with booze, prostitutes, and the usual Washingtoninan inside-the-beltway drunken orgies. And they seem to be trying to do it by taking more than half of some people's income to 'redirect" it to the Dem's coffers. The "true" values of the Demoncrats on display again! Don't you just love those socialists? How they impoverish nearly the entire country so they live lavishly? How they do love that pretense of being for the little people all the while boozing and partying like the college campuses across America?  And on the dime of the "little people" ! Who would NEVER support the dems willingly! {I am talking about me as one of these people who will have to scrimp and save to exist while they party-hardy because they took 60% of my monthly income for rent this month for a "subsidized" unit.

There was a time when being embarrassed and ashamed of my situation would have kept me silent but that time is gone. I realized that IF I didn't tell this, who would? Who could? Do other women even more poor than me with small children and in my situation have a computer, the internet and the writing skills to tell this? No, probably not.  And of course,I thought it was me that they were targeting because I am prolife, educated and Republican, and that is probably true; but when the black woman singer who sang her song instead of the National Anthem in Denver at the State of The City address by Mayor Hickenlooper [fondly called "Hick"  by the locals] she said, that the black people in Denver are struggling to survive while the dems were planning to "celebrate" with their benefits they need [not her exact words, read the Denver Post about a week ago]. So then I figured they raised their rents too! That $15 MILLION will buy a lot of booze and s-e-x on Denver's infamous streets where the women, the pimps, the corrupt Police and the either ignorant of the law Denver Judges or the corrupt Judges, take your pick on that one, will be there with bells on.  I have to walkabout because it is about the only form of transportation I am able to afford except with RTD to distant places, because I foolishly trusted the "system" some years ago and instead of investing my money into something that paid interest I went along to get along and put my 'nest egg' in the government's coffers.I had no real anxieties about that until I needed the return on my investment after events that nearly killed me in several ways only to discover that "benefits' are the political reward system mostly for the dems. This is how I discovered it to be:

if you go along with the socialist agenda, you will have plenty of money for a life of crime, bedlam, illicit s-e-x, prostitution, violence, dru-gging, trafficking, boozing; BUT IF that is not your "value system" then you will suffer. If you protest killing, or corruption of 'leaders' , or se-xual molestation of minors, or illegal immigrants, or sodomy forced on children, or the concept that sinning is a "right", then you lose many of the "benefits' the wicked get, as a form of punishment. I attest to that; but I have survived and by the grace of GOD am finding a shred of peace and happiness in a rather limited existence at present.

This is my effort to cause people to think and I realize that is not a favorite past-time in America. Also while you are at it, read how the pagan/heathen societies focused on public games, and child sacrifice [abortion, and smashing in the heads of children and tossing them in the volcano]; and lavish parties for the Chieftain, while the fiefs or serfs [?peasants] worked without pay and at the Chief's mercy. Of course, in America, those who work for campaigns are very rich, and travel about,and if they win the election it is even more of the parties,drinking, womanizing, leading of reprobate lives. It is the kind of life,the first Patriots of America left England to escape.

Don' t get me wrong about England. I love England and would live there, but I am a Republican if not a no-centralized-government kind of woman, but I realize I am probably more self disciplined than most from years of dedication to a cause of pleasing GOD. What I do not want to see happen in America is the turning to the leftist regimes I have described in this entry, but it seems it is being anticipated in Denver. Here is my name for Denver: Demonic, Demoncratic, Denver. The concept of abiding by civil law is not familiar to them here, and it does not look as if it will ever catch on.

signed gloria poole, RN and artist

Please visit these sites of mine before you vote;

http://prolife-activist.info

http://vote-prolife.info

http://life-is-good.info

http://children-are-blessings.info

http://consider-the-lilies.info

http://save-baby-humans.org

http://save-human-race.info

http://please.save-baby-humans.org

http://write-for-life.info

Ms. Mrozek is also involved in the Institute of Marriage and Family. It seems like a good organization.

Tratatul de la Lisabona

În alt colţ de Europa, o tânără fată este violată şi rămâne însărcinată. Sarcina fiind înaintată, nici unul dintre medicii români nu s-a arătat dispus să ucidă pruncul prin avort, mai ales că legea ce reglementează în România pruncuciderea nu permite omorârea copiilor nenăscuţi după 20 de săptămâni de la conceperea acestora.

Cum suntem, însă, buni cetăţeni europeni, copila şi pruncul ei încă nenăscut au fost îmbarcaţi într-un avion şi trimişi într-o ţară care ucide copii şi la vârste mai înaintate. Iar Ministerul Sănătăţii a pus, împreună cu alte ministere, de o comisie care să propună modificarea legii spre a permite avortul eventual până în momentul naşterii.

Iată două evenimente de ultimă oră care contribuie la întărirea convingerii mele conform căreia civilizaţia propusă de către Uniunea Europeană este una anti-creştină, anti-umanistă, ilogică şi implicit anti-europeană. Am şi un motiv de bucurie: Tratatul de la Lisabona a fost îngropat de voinţa populară irlandeză, ca şi de hotărârea Preşedintelui Poloniei de a nu ratifica un asemenea document ce atentează la chiar identitatea culturilor europene.

O bucurie de scurtă durată. În cel mai democratic spirit, Comisia Europeană şi Parlamenul European lucrează la o a treia soluţie constituţională, care să nu trebuiască ratificată de nici un referendum naţional şi, dacă se poate, nici măcar de structurile parlamentare statale. E de ajuns acceptul birocraţilor şi ideologilor „europeni”, nu?

Clasa politică din România a ratificat, în mare linişte şi fără nici un comentariu, tratatul de la Lisabona. De la ultimul deputat până la Preşedinte, clasa politică a jucat iresponsabil soarta României, nesupunând dezbaterii publice şi referendumului această mega-inepţie comunitară, ce ne-ar fi obligat (dacă nu ar fi fost irlandezii) să aplicăm legi absurde, să devenim dependenţi de birocraţia de la Bruxelles şi să generăm, la rândul nostru, legi stupide şi birocraţie.

Un popor bine dresat

Dar nici românii „obişnuiţi” nu au făcut nimic. Mişcarea Pro Life este foarte activă doar pe Internet (cu excepţia muncii părintelui Nicolae Tănase de la Valea Plopului, desigur). Cazul tinerei mame silite de „opinia publică” să îşi ucidă copilul i-a prins nepregătiţi pe militanţii pro-life, care au reacţionat timid şi ineficient. Bisericile au făcut dovada maximă a ineficienţei lor prin tăcerea neoprotestanţilor, protestanţilor şi catolicilor sau prin reacţia stupidă a purtătorului de cuvânt al Patriarhiei (care nu citeşte nici măcar documentele propriei instituţii) şi prin comportamentul letargic al celorlalte structuri din BOR.

Cât despre eurosceptici, aceştia sunt foarte tăcuţi atunci când nu sunt penibili. Euroscepticismul nostru este redus la o cârcotăşeală „la o bere” şi nu se încheagă nicidecum într-un discurs coerent şi constructiv. Suntem nemulţumiţi de multe, suntem rezervaţi cu privire la şi mai multe, dar ne comportăm ca şi cum am fi sub ocupaţia militară a UE şi nu ca nişte cetăţeni europeni cu drepturi şi obligaţii depline.

În concluzie, suntem un popor bine dresat. Atât de dresat încât am şi început să reacţionăm „conform cu standardele europene”. Dovadă declaraţiile celor de la PSD care condamnă politicile de securitate ale statului italian, uitând, într-o schizofrenie tipic europeană, de marile probleme de securitate pe care cetăţeni de-ai noştri (deşi nu români) le-au provocat italienilor. Oricum, isteria ideologilor europeni declanşată de voinţa guvernului italian de a-şi rezolva ferm şi democratic problemele ar trebui să arate celor care au ochi să vadă cât de anti-europeană este birocraţia UE.

Totalitarismul birocraţiei

Ce rămâne, totuşi, de făcut? Dacă nu am fi atât de neputincioşi am avea o soluţie: contrarevoluţia conservatoare! Care nu este altceva decât curajul de a gândi singur şi subiectiv problemele care te privesc. Numai prin asumarea libertăţii responsabile, numai prin refuzul delegării dreptului de a gândi şi decide pentru tine lucrurile se mai pot schimba.

Lumea recentă ne propune o nouă formă de totalitarism: cea a birocraţiei. Desigur, cei care cunosc cât de cât marxism-leninismul observă că nu e vorba despre nimic nou: birocraţia a fost tot timpul concepută de comunişti ca fiind un veritabil creier social.

Acestui nou totalitarism nu i se poate opune decât libertatea individuală. Iar în locul valorilor acestui imperialism birocratic nu se pot aşeza decât valorile tradiţiei.

Ceea ce spun eu nu este în nici un caz o noutate. Are un corespondent în cea mai bună administraţie politică americană din toată istoria Statelor Unite: administaţia Reagan.

Pentru Reagan au existat doi adversari: etatismul birocratic al stângii şi „revoluţia culturală”. În spatele acestor doi adversari se găseşte, desigur, acelaşi duh: stafia comunismului.

„Government is not the solution to our problems. Government is the problem”. Acesta a fost motto-ul administraţiei Reagan. Şi probabil că ar trebui să fie soluţia conservatorilor europeni la problemele provocate de monstruozitatea birocratică numită Uniunea Europeană.

Pentru ca Reagan să ajungă, însă, la putere iar mizeria revoluţiilor hippiote şi anticulturale să poată să fie cât de cât curăţată, a fost nevoie de o trezire a Americii profunde. Aşa cum este necesară o trezire a Europei profunde.

Artizanii acestei treziri nu au fost intelectualii (majoritatea de stânga, socialişti şi utopici), nu au fost nici „formatorii de opinie” din mass-media, bolnavi, atunci, ca şi acum, de pacifism, ecologism şi alte „-isme” periculoase. Cei care au trezit America au fost oamenii credincioşi (protestanţi, catolici, evrei) ce au preferat tradiţia revoluţiilor culturale. Ei au construit ceea ce a rămas în istorie sub denumirea de „majoritate morală”.

Redescoperirea libertăţii

România anului 2008 este în plină criză. Criza economică, accentuată de politici socialiste fără acoperire este dublată de criza valorilor, care duce la abdicările în faţa UE, la uciderea pruncilor nenăscuţi şi la relativizarea lucrurilor cu adevărat importante.

Cei care s-au împotrivit acestei crize, intelectualii de dreapta, au făcut până acum dovada ineficienţei lor. Blocaţi într-un discurs inactual, închişi într-un inaccesibil turn de fildeş, incapabili să facă paşi decisivi pentru schimbarea la faţă a României, majoritatea acestor intelectuali se bucură de micile victorii pe care le mai pot obţine prin şi mai mica lor influenţă pe lângă Preşedintele Băsescu.

Dar România merită altceva. De aceea este o obligaţie a cultelor religioase ce nu acceptă relativizările „made in EU” să pornească la drum acum, când avem şansa de a ne vota altfel parlamentarii (prin vot uninominal). Dacă vom rata şi această şansă de normalizare prin întoarcere la valori şi prin redescoperirea libertăţii, s-ar putea ca altă dată să fie prea târziu.

Eu sunt gata să acţionez. Cine mi se alătură?

18 died - 18 lives. This brought our estimated total for the year up to 742.

If you would like to stand with us in silent prayer and protest, call the Helpers of God’s Precious Infants at 309-453-7493.

But it was sourced from http://jaxconservativeradical.blogspot.com/2008/07/my-way-to-fund-medicare.html

emaxhealth haven’t approved my reply yet (Shock) but I visited the Jax and shared my opinion on his epiphany.

He writes:

"I have an idea where the Congress can discover some of the money needed to keep funding the medicare program at it’s present level.
Congress spends the following amounts of your tax dollars supporting America’s own genocide, abortion!
In 2003, Planned Parenthood Federation of America extinguished the lives of 244,628 unborn babies — making the organization more deadly than leukemia, brain cancer, skin cancer, diabetes, car accidents, Alzheimer’s disease, and HIV/AIDS combined."

He also quotes some impressive dollar amounts that the US Government have paid to planned parenthood

“2003-2004 … $ 35.2 million in tax money
2002-2003 … $ 36.6 million in tax money
2001-2002 … $ 12.2 million in tax money
2000-2001 … $ 38.9 million in tax money
1999-2000 .. $ 59.5 million in tax money
1998-1999 … $125.8 million in tax money
1997-1998 … $ 42.1 million in tax money”

Source: JaxConsertive - I haven’t attempted to verify the information, it’s moot as far as I’m concerned. Here is my reply:

“And if these operations were paid for by the government, meaning that the women undergoing the procedure were unable to, the tax payers would no doubt have carry the cost of those unwanted children over a course of 18 years. ....more

...every day of his life.

Psalm 8:2: Out of the mouth of babes and nursing infants You have ordained strength, Because of Your enemies, That You may silence the enemy and the avenger.

Some would consider Eliot's an empty life, but consider all those he touched in his short sojourn of 99 days. His life was a miracle and an inspiration.

Is yours?