<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>trustrank &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://wordpress.com/tag/trustrank/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "trustrank"</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:35:17 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Les nouvelles techniques de référencement]]></title>
<link>http://blogdmi.wordpress.com/?p=40</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>blogdmi</dc:creator>
<guid>http://blog.dubucmarketing.com/2008/07/07/les-nouvelles-techniques-de-referencement/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[par Jocelyn
Comment améliorer et anticiper le référencement de son site web, le Journal du Net fo]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:justify;"><em>par Jocelyn</em></p>
<p><em>Comment améliorer et anticiper le référencement de son site web, <a href="http://www.journaldunet.com/solutions/moteur-referencement/chat/raphael-richard-neodia-webmarketing-pour-obtenir-des-resultats-au-moment-voulu-il-faut-anticiper-le-referencement.shtml">le Journal du Net </a>fourni un article très intéressant sur les bonnes pratiques pour organiser sa visibilité sur les moteurs de recherche (principalement Google) et contrôler son image. Ces questions se pose pour toute compagnie présente sur Internet et, comme c’est un des savoir faire central de <a href="http://www.dubucmarketing.com/">Dubuc Marketing</a>, il m’a semblé intéressant d’écrire sur le sujet.</em></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;"><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.marketing-etudiant.fr/images/actualites/referencement-pays.gif" alt="" width="208" height="162" />Tout d’abord, contrôler son image sur Google est possible… mais en partie seulement ! La première chose consiste à apparaître le plus haut possible sur des requêtes incluant sa marque (marque seule, nom de domaine, fautes d'orthographe, combinaison de type avis+marque, achat+marque, prix+produit, etc...).</p>
<p>Il faut aussi identifier les éventuels forums de discussion qui ressortent au moment d'une recherche sur votre marque ou sur des mots clés liés à votre activité et vous efforcer d'y installer une présence surtout si votre marque y est soumise à rude épreuve ! En effet, dans ce cas adopter une démarche d’influence <em>« douce »</em>, tout en restant très transparent sur son identité, ne peut que jouer en votre faveur.</p>
<p><em><strong>"Apparaître en tête des résultats vous accorde de la crédibilité"</strong></em></p>
<p>D’après notre expérience, un bon référencement sur le web est une présence officielle de la marque. Les compagnies évitent ainsi de faire de la publicité "bête" et adaptent au contraire une approche SAV / réponse aux questions / objections des clients en évitant les superlatifs sur la marque de plus en plus mal perçus : cela s’inscrit dans la logique des nouvelles techniques marketings.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;"><!--more--><br />
<strong>La perception de la marque par ses clients s’améliore-t-elle dès les premiers résultats sur les moteurs de recherche ?</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Oui, en partie (une fois encore !!). Dans les années 50, pour être crédible, il fallait passer dans le journal, dans les années 80, c’était à la télévision, dans les années 2000, il faut être en tête de position dans Google. Cela paraît simple, mais internet ne représente que le premier point de contact avec la marque : si le site mal conçu, qu’il n'inspire pas confiance, où que l'on trouve mal ce que l'on cherche, il a tôt fait de porter atteinte à l'image de marque de votre société.</p>
<p><strong>Comment rendre un site populaire ?<br />
</strong><br />
Pour ne parler que du référencement, cela revient à s'interroger sur les moyens d'augmenter le Page Rank, qui est l’indice de popularité utilisé par Google depuis sa création.</p>
<p>Plusieurs écoles se sont succédé, nous y reviendrons plus tard. Mais l’année 2007 a marquée une rupture dans la manière de référencer depuis 3 ou 4 ans : Google a commencé à sanctionner certains sites qui avaient tentés de manipuler leur PR de façon trop ostensible, et Google se mettrai aussi à sanctionner les méthodes de stimulation de PR plus élaboré (liens de bas de page, liens posés sur des sites non relies à votre thématique et d'une façon générale, tout lien qui ne serait pas naturel). Ces techniques fonctionnent encore très bien, mais je pense que leur usage va devenir de plus en plus dangereux.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Donc, nous conseillons à nos clients de mettre en place une stratégie de long terme : diffusion de communiqués, création de relations avec des sites connexes, création de contenu à valeur ajoutée pour diffusion sur des sites tiers, extension du nombre d'annuaires dans lesquels le site est inscrit optimisation du linking naturel entre site de la même société (dans le cas des grandes entreprises, il faut prévoir des opérations de sensibilisation spéciales netlinlinking et définir une charte du netlinking car les synergies netlinkesques se mettent rarement en route dans la douceur au sein des grandes sociétés...</p>
<p>Le bruit court sur le net qu’il y a deux pages ranks, un affiché et un autre caché par Google. Nous partagons ce point de vue à Dubuc Marketing, dans la mesure ou le page rank affiché ne semble plus être mis à jour que aussi souvent qu’auparavant et que le page rank de certains sites "surveillés" par Google est ostensiblement faux. Google a opéré ce changement de politique afin de rendre plus difficile la manipulation du PR par les référenceurs et pour gêner la pratique de la vente de liens payants, dont le prix était déterminé par le page rank affiché.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Néanmoins, pour simplifier encore la tache du référenceur, Google a introduit un nouvel indice, le trust rank qui est un équivalent du page rank permettant d'attribuer une note de confiance à votre site. Mais si tout le monde parle du <a href="http://docs.abondance.com/question106.html">trust rank</a> et que de nombreuses hypothèses fusent ici et là, peu de référenceurs parviennent à le manipuler. Mais pour combien de temps encore ?</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;"><strong>Comment choisir le texte de présentation sur les moteurs dans le référencement naturel ?</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Chaque moteur détermine, lui même le texte qui s'affiche sous le résultat. Dans le cas de Google (85% des recherches…), il s'agit de l'extrait le plus pertinent de la page en relation avec la recherche effectuée par l'internaute. La description qui s'affiche lors d'une recherche sur la marque est celle qui figure dans http://www.dmoz.org/, l'annuaire Open source dans lequel Google vient puiser ses descriptions. Cela fait donc partie du travail de référencement d’optimiser cette description.</p>
<p>Voilà donc mon petit résumé sur le référencement. Vous l’aurez compris, l’optimisation est à l’image du net : en constant évolution. Seule l’importance du référencement reste constante. Pour plus d'information, visionner l'entrevue du <a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/search/interview%2Bdavid%2Bdegrelle%2Bjdnet/video/x3zmn6_interview-david-degrelle-jdnet_business">président de l'agence marketing 1ère position</a>, qui dresse le bilan des évolutions du référencement pour l'année 2007.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[RankingSite.eu Web Site Ranking]]></title>
<link>http://ramsdiffusion.wordpress.com/?p=5</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 17:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>ramsdiffusion</dc:creator>
<guid>http://ramsdiffusion.it.wordpress.com/2008/05/25/rankingsiteeu-web-site-ranking/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[
RankingSite.eu web site ranking. E una Web Directory per l’Indicizzazione e recensione siti Web G]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="snap_preview">
<p>RankingSite.eu web site ranking. E una Web Directory per l’Indicizzazione e recensione siti Web Gratis con possibilità di votare e commentare i siti web…</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rankingsite.eu/"><span style="color:#b85b5a;">http://www.rankingsite.eu</span></a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[RankingSite.eu Web Site Ranking]]></title>
<link>http://rankingsite.wordpress.com/?p=5</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 17:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>rankingsite</dc:creator>
<guid>http://rankingsite.it.wordpress.com/2008/05/25/rankingsiteeu-web-site-ranking/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[RankingSite.eu web site ranking. E una Web Directory per l’Indicizzazione e recensione siti Web Gr]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RankingSite.eu web site ranking. E una Web Directory per l’Indicizzazione e recensione siti Web Gratis con possibilità di votare e commentare i siti web…</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rankingsite.eu">http://www.rankingsite.eu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[RankingSite.eu Web Site Ranking]]></title>
<link>http://keox.wordpress.com/?p=12</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 09:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>keox</dc:creator>
<guid>http://keox.it.wordpress.com/2008/05/25/rankingsiteeu-web-site-ranking/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[RankingSite.eu web site ranking. E una Web Directory per l&#8217;Indicizzazione e recensione siti We]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RankingSite.eu web site ranking. E una Web Directory per l'Indicizzazione e recensione siti Web Gratis con possibilità di votare e commentare i siti web...</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rankingsite.eu">http://www.rankingsite.eu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[RankingSite.eu Web Ranking Site]]></title>
<link>http://byjobs.wordpress.com/?p=6</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 13:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>byjobs</dc:creator>
<guid>http://byjobs.it.wordpress.com/2008/05/24/rankingsiteeu-web-ranking-site/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[RankingSite.eu web site ranking. E una Web Directory per l&#8217;Indicizzazione e recensione siti We]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RankingSite.eu web site ranking. E una Web Directory per l'Indicizzazione e recensione siti Web Gratis con possibilità di votare e commentare i siti web.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rankingsite.eu">http://www.rankingsite.eu</a></p>
<p>-----------------------------------------------------------</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[TrustRank]]></title>
<link>http://strumic.wordpress.com/?p=8</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 16:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>rismacardiaca</dc:creator>
<guid>http://strumic.it.wordpress.com/2008/05/19/trustrank/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Ho trovato un articolo sui sistemi di indicizzazione delle pagine web che forse potrebbe interessarc]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ho trovato un articolo sui sistemi di indicizzazione delle pagine web che forse potrebbe interessarci.          Ve ne riporto un estratto:</p>
<p>Il <strong>PageRank</strong>, algoritmo, sul quale si basa l’indicizzazione di Google, assegna un punteggio ad ogni pagina, basandosi sul numero di link che puntano ad essa. Il PageRank di un sito aumenta in relazione alla qualità delle pagine web che linkano il sito. Purtroppo il PageRank non garantisce la qualità reale dei siti indicizzati.<br />
Il <strong>TrustRank</strong> invece cerca di definire la qualità di una pagina in base alla valutazione umana.<br />
Da questo è possibile comunque generare un semplice algoritmo che assegna una valore binario pari a 0 se la pagina contiene spam (bad page), oppure pari a 1 se la pagina è da considerarsi di buona qualità o senza spam (good page).<br />
Risulta evidente quindi che non è più il link che definisce la qualità di una pagine, ma l’intervento umano che istruisce l’algoritmo.</p>
<p>Qui trovate l'articolo:  <a href="http://www.officialsm.net/articoli/trustrank_for_dummies.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.officialsm.net/articoli/trustrank_for_dummies.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google TrustRank]]></title>
<link>http://marketing212.wordpress.com/2008/03/24/google-trustrank/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>salman212</dc:creator>
<guid>http://marketing212.it.wordpress.com/2008/03/24/google-trustrank/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Trust Google rank and Google&#8217;s Sandbox filters are often in the forums. How to manipulate thes]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trust Google rank and Google's Sandbox filters are often in the forums. How to manipulate these filters is widely discussed and since Google recently is consitently draw more than 45 percent of searches, the ability to use trust rank is a huge advantage for each SEO.</p>
<p>The first step is the definition of these terms and to assess what these filters are:</p>
<p>The Google Sandbox filter and the filter cabinet Trust Google are software algorythims that the attempt to filter sites by a number of factors to punish either a page or a page push to high rankings. One of the factors for this man filter is TIME.</p>
<p>The age of the domain and the site of the immense influence on the ranking of your site in Google. MSN and Yahoo! They show Rankings much earlier then google. Google algo checks your sites inbound links and Web sites that you over time.</p>
<p>If you just bought a new domain name, the Google Sandbox filter into the game and most likely you will not see any great results in Google for over 8 months to one year. Some keywords, NONE competitive could give you a bit of luck in Google as the filter to competitive keywords and not necessarily less competitive. Google does not know whether they can trust your site is still a most sites are up one minute and another, his way us a nice, clean SERPS.</p>
<p>New Web sites in general tend to deal with more than filter Web sites that have been around longer. Many times a new site could provide some rankings in Google within the first few months after it online and then suddenly disappeared the rankings are one this is due to the sandbox filter from Google.</p>
<p>The Sandbox rank and trust are closely linked but are 2 different animals ..</p>
<p>Trust cabinet has some facets. One way to trustrank Google is to be ethical with your SEO practices and move us your website with quality and optimize the quality inbound links and above all time. Let Google to get to know and trust your site.</p>
<p>A site with a high trust ranking will probably not be put into operation and the sandpit adversly a page in the sandbox probably not have good confidence rank.</p>
<p>And how do I get from the sandbox?</p>
<p>To circumvent the sandbox people have the confidence rank filters, to do so. Have you ever seen an advertisement for a brand new film and his suddenly at the top of Google for its specific term? This is due to the many ads on very, very trusted sites such as the homepage of MSN and other news-related sites. The reason why many sites by the sandbox, as many website with high confidence Rank link to a brand new website.</p>
<p>It is very difficult to do this technique usually costs a lot of money in contextual advertising, but if you do SEO to a page with a large budget, I would recommend using this technique.</p>
<p>To set themselves a series of confidence network sites you need time, lots of effort, a link department and more time with money for contextual advertising. Many large companies, the sites are often benefite of anything because they could potentially have a system could manipulate that the Google sandbox and Google Trust rank filters for their own advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Trustrank : le PageRank 2.0]]></title>
<link>http://webmastero.wordpress.com/?p=3</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 20:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Imintar</dc:creator>
<guid>http://webmastero.it.wordpress.com/2008/02/08/trustrank-le-pagerank-20/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[

La mort du PageRank

Les rumeurs qui circulaient depuis des moi laissé entendre  que l&#8217;alg]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://blog-web-marketing.fr/Images/pagerank.jpg" alt="PageRank Google Trustrank" align="left" height="157" width="198" /></p>
<ul>
<li><i><b>La mort du PageRank</b></i></li>
</ul>
<p>Les rumeurs qui circulaient depuis des moi laissé entendre  que l'algorithme du <b>PageRank</b>, propriété de l'université de <b>Standford</b>, était abandonné par Google pour ne pas devoir payer de royalties. Ou que <a href="http://google.com" target="_blank">Google</a> laissait tomber le Pagerank pour faire cesser les abus qu'il suscitait  notamment échange de liens artificiels, vente de liens, etc... Certains prétendaient  que Google avait atteint sa limite en terme de nombre de pages indexées, et qu'il était tout simplement  "cassé".</p>
<p>Une équipe de référenceurs Français <b>DarkSeo Team</b> a même réussi cracké le PR en obtenant une valeur de 10/10.  Même s’il ne s’agit encore que de rumeurs, le <b>Google PageRank</b> va surement  disparaitre.</p>
<ul>
<li><i><b>En attendant l'après PageRank </b></i></li>
</ul>
<p>Le <b>PageRank</b> aujourd'hui ne sert plus qu'a pénalisé les sites soupçonnés par Google de s'adonner a un trafic de lien échangé, et montrer qu'ils tiennent toujours le contrôle su le Web .</p>
<p>Si le PageRank n'est plus un critère déterminant, la notion de lien et son importance dans l'algorithme de Google reste cependant le premier critère pour positionner un site Web et augmenter son rythme d'indexation et de rafraichissement.  Cependant Google vas voir la qualité des lien plutôt que leurs nombre. l ne suffira pas d’acheter un lien, il faudra un lien pertinent (en rapport avec votre site).</p>
<ul>
<li><i><b>TrustRank </b></i></li>
</ul>
<p>Le TrustRank est en somme un indice de confiance qui est rapidement devenu un sujet à la mode lorsque la communauté des spécialistes de Google et des webmasters s'est aperçue que Google venait de déposer cette marque en mars 2005. Le vocable avait été introduit une année plus tôt par un article publié à Standford exposant une méthode pour combattre le spamdexing. Certains se sont alors avancés à prédire la mort prochaine du PageRank. En fait cette vision est excessive puisque TrustRank et PageRank apparaissent largement complémentaires.</p>
<p>Voici un excellent article sur le <a href="http://www.ultra-fluide.com/ressources/referencement/trustrank.htm" target="_blank">Combat du spamdexing avec le TrustRank</a></p>
<h1></h1>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Dalla Link popularity alla Social Popularity]]></title>
<link>http://lascatoladipandora.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/dalla-link-popularity-alla-social-popularity/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>gabrielem</dc:creator>
<guid>http://lascatoladipandora.it.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/dalla-link-popularity-alla-social-popularity/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[La popolarità di un sito non consiste nel essere presenti nelle prime pagine dei motori di ricerca,]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>La popolarità di un sito non consiste nel essere presenti nelle prime pagine dei motori di ricerca, come per esempio goggle o yahoo, ma è uno degli elementi che permette questa presenza. Popolare significa appunto noto al pubblico, conosciuto ed in certo senso consigliato, in un primo momento su internet la popolarità di un sito viene espressa dalla quantità di link provenieneti dalla rete che il sito ottiene nel tempo, questo è quindi un aspetto molto importante, e infatti, se molte persone linkano una risorsa è già un chiaro segno di popolarità. Una legge, in un certo senzo, per quantificare questo genere di popolarità è stato il <a href="http://lascatoladipandora.wordpress.com/2007/08/11/pagerank/" title="PageRank">PageRank</a> di Google. Ma come si dice: "... fatta la legge trovato l'inganno", questo sistema ha portato rapidamente alla creazione di link farm, ovvero siti realizzati al solo scopo di generare un alto numero di link verso altri siti per elevarne artificialmente la popolarità, questo ha portato ad un'invasione, nei risultati dei motori, di siti SPAM ovvero non veramente pertinenti con i risultati di ricerca e quindi di bassa qualità.</p>
<p>Oggi invece, oltre a vedere nello scenario dei motori di ricerca grandi cambiamenti come il <a href="http://lascatoladipandora.wordpress.com/2007/08/03/il-trustrank-di-google/" title="TrustRank">TrustRank</a> di Google, e la ricerca di pertinenza e di corrispondenza dei contenuti tra i siti che si linkano, esiste un modo nuovo di concepire la popolarità su intenret ed è la Social Popularity.</p>
<p>Per <b>Social Popularity</b> non intendo come si potrebbe pensare la popolarità che un sito, un servizio op un brand ha nei social network, o almeno non solo, ma più specificamente la popolarità nell'ambito della società internettiana, che dipende da moltissimi fattori. Alcuni di questi fattori riguardano aspetti facilmente misurabili, come la presenza in parte di link ma soprattutto di articoli, recenzioni, file multimediali come audio, video, slide. Altri fattori sono più sottili anche se anch'essi possono essere misurati e dipendono più dall'opinione che il pubblico si costruisce nel tempo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Il TrustRank e la penalizzazione passiva]]></title>
<link>http://lascatoladipandora.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/il-trustrank-e-la-penalizzazione-passiva/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>gabrielem</dc:creator>
<guid>http://lascatoladipandora.it.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/il-trustrank-e-la-penalizzazione-passiva/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[In seguito a varie discussioni sull&#8217;argomento, che a me pareva tanto chiaro, espongo brevement]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1006/1212470802_5420cfa2b6_o.jpg" align="left" border="0" hspace="10" />In seguito a varie discussioni sull'argomento, che a me pareva tanto chiaro, espongo brevemente la problematica delle penalizzazioni, nelle <a href="http://lascatoladipandora.wordpress.com/2007/08/01/serp/" title="SERP - Search Engine Report Page">serp</a> di google, che posono derivare per un sito da link che provengono da fonti considerate spam da google.</p>
<p>Con l'ormai noto avvento del <a href="http://lascatoladipandora.wordpress.com/2007/08/03/il-trustrank-di-google/" title="TrustRank">TrustRank</a> lo spettro delle penalizzazioni si è allargato, ora anche i link provenienti dall'esterno possono generare penalizzazioni più o meno gravi. Infatti essendo il TrustRank un valore che si distribuisce da un sito all'alto tramite i link, se un sito viene linkato in maggioranza da siti che secondo l'algoritmo di google del TrustRank sono considerati spam, allora anche quel ito viene considerato spam e di conseguenza penalizzato e magari addirittura escluso dalle serp!</p>
<p>Questo significa che tra le varie azioni scorrette che si possono attuare per penalizzare un concorrente si è aggiunta la generazioni di matrici di link dannose per un sito.</p>
<p>Il modo migliore per difendersi è quello di ottenere un numero sempre maggiore di link con alto trust in modo da bilanciare l'effetto negativo dei link provenienti da siti spam.</p>
<p>La conferma di quanto detto viene chiaramente dalle parole di google che in <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#38;answer=34449">questa pagina</a> afferma:</p>
<p>"<em>There's <strong>almost</strong> nothing a competitor can do to harm your ranking or have your site removed from our index</em>".</p>
<p>ovvero: "Non c'è <strong>quasi</strong> nulla che un concorrente può fare per danneggiare il rank del vostro sito o rimuoverlo dal nostro indice" .</p>
<p>Ed è chiaro che se non c'è quasi niente qualcosa c'è, come è chiaro che neanche google ne parli chiaro perchè è una cosa che potrebbe indispettire molte persone, e quindi essendo un'azione indispensabile per la lotta allo spam, che però può non essere ben accettata dalla comunità del web allora non dico che viene occultata, ma neanche messa in mostra.</p>
<p>Segnalo inoltre un interessante articolo di Marketing Routes, sulle varie <a href="http://www.marketingroutes.com/2007/07/02/seobotaggio/">teniche di sabotaggio</a> che un conorrente potrebbe attuare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[PageRank]]></title>
<link>http://lascatoladipandora.wordpress.com/2007/08/11/pagerank/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>gabrielem</dc:creator>
<guid>http://lascatoladipandora.it.wordpress.com/2007/08/11/pagerank/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Il PageRank, è una scala logaritmica di valori che google assegna alle pagine web per attribuirne u]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Il <a href="http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank" title="PageRank">PageRank</a>, è una scala logaritmica di valori che google assegna alle pagine web per attribuirne un peso, in termini di visibilità, sempre meno influente ed è stato prima affiancato e poi via via sostituito dal <a href="http://lascatoladipandora.wordpress.com/2007/08/03/il-trustrank-di-google/" title="TrustRank">TrustRank</a> (<a href="http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/TrustRank" title="definizione di Trust rank">definizione</a>), si basa sulla quantità di link in entrata che una pagina. In questa <a href="http://www.google.it/intl/it/why_use.html" title="guida alle funzioni di ricerca">guida ufficiale di google</a> c'è una definizione di PageRank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Il TrustRank di Google]]></title>
<link>http://lascatoladipandora.wordpress.com/2007/08/03/il-trustrank-di-google/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 09:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>gabrielem</dc:creator>
<guid>http://lascatoladipandora.it.wordpress.com/2007/08/03/il-trustrank-di-google/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Il TrustRank è un&#8217;analisi dei link, semi-automatica, che permette di riconoscere e dividere l]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Il TrustRank è un'analisi dei link, semi-automatica, che permette di riconoscere e dividere le pagini utili da quelle spam. Il semi-automatismo deriva dal fatto che il TrustRank si basa su siti matrice denominati Seeds che sono dei siti scelti di norma da persone, chiamate Oracolo o Quality Rater, pagate da google per valutare le pagine web ed attribuirgli un valore positivo o negativo. Un sito non spam non linkerà un sito spam, attraverso questo passaggio di fiducia viene stabilità una rete "buona" ed una "cattiva"!</p>
<p>Stabilire con certezza quali siano i siti Seeds è molto difficile alcuni sono facilmente ipotizzabili, per esempio la directory di Yahoo, altre directory importanti dove è molto difficile entrare e dove i controlli di qualità sono molto alti, siti governativi e siti .edu spesso.</p>
<p>Per la definizione ufficiale di TrustRank c'è <a href="http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/TrustRank" title="TrustRank wikipedia">Wikipedia (in italiano)</a>  e <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TrustRank" title="TrustRank wikipedia">Wikipedia (in inglese)</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The harder to get the link, the more valuable it is]]></title>
<link>http://hamletbatista.com/2007/05/27/the-harder-to-get-the-link-the-more-valuable-it-is/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 02:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hamletb</dc:creator>
<guid>http://hamletb.it.wordpress.com/2007/05/27/the-harder-to-get-the-link-the-more-valuable-it-is/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Links that are too easy or relatively easy to get do not help much in getting traffic or authority f]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Links that are too easy or relatively easy to get do not help much in getting traffic or authority for search engine rankings.</p>
<p>If your link is placed on a page where there are several hundred links competing for attention, it is less likely that potential visitors will click than if the page only has a few dozen links.</p>
<p>The value of your link source is in direct relation to how selective that source is when placing links on the page and how much traffic the source gets.   The value also declines with the number of links on the page.</p>
<p>Google is understood to use algorithms to measure the importance and quality of each page.  The <a href="http://infolab.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html" target="_blank">PageRank</a> was invented by Google founders and is used for measuring absolute importance of a page.  The <a href="http://www.vldb.org/conf/2004/RS15P3.PDF" target="_blank">TrustRank</a> algorithm describes a technique for identifying trustworthy pages -- quality pages.  We can not tell for sure to what extent Google is using this algorithm if at all, or at least their publicly known version.  What we <em>can</em> say, is that based on observation, we can definitely say that they do not treat all links equal and they do not pass authority to your page from all of your link sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Better Web Design &amp; Rankings - The Values of a Link]]></title>
<link>http://webdesigntips.wordpress.com/2006/11/09/better-web-design-rankings-the-values-of-a-link/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 17:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>webdesigntips</dc:creator>
<guid>http://webdesigntips.it.wordpress.com/2006/11/09/better-web-design-rankings-the-values-of-a-link/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Since most link building campaigns are done to support ongoing ranking strategies, it&#8217;s import]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since most link building campaigns are done to support ongoing ranking strategies, it's important to know where and how to look for "link traps" that keep you from your Search Engine Optmization (SEO) efforts and goals. Websites that employ the use of robots.txt, JavaScript or certain redirects should be avoided. Websites that show no meter of Google green (PR) should be thoroughly checked. It's important to secure links from a venue a search engine can spider. Links from websites outside your industry niche won't hurt your link buidling effort, however they don't provide a good ranking boost contribution since it doesn't reinforce any revelancy of your keywords.  <strong>Overview</strong><br />
Reciprocal linking is an effective way of generating targeted, topic related traffic to your website. By increasing the amount of websites that pass a vote to your web page through the use of a backlink, the more important Googles will deem your website, which with time will lead to higher Search Engine Result Pages (SERP's).</p>
<p>What we will focus on is determining which link exchange partners have links that are worthwhile of your time &#38; effort. When looking for link exchange partners you want to look at multiple factors to ensure you are receiving a quality link exchange that allows a vote to be passed back to your web page. Intensed Development is going to review 3 factors that qualifies the link as a good exchange:</p>
<ul> 1. Passing a vote<br />
2. Passing traffic<br />
3. Passing PageRank<br />
4. TrustRank</ul>
<hr />
<h4>1. Passing a Vote</h4>
<p>This factor is more virtual than materialistic since this would at most times be based on your personal opinion. The quality of the vote passed on to your web page consists of multiple pointers that you have to ask yourself:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Is it informative to your websites topic? Does it provide a quantity of quality content? </strong>  Stick to websites that provide unique content that provides additonal insight and is revelant to your websites topic.</li>
<li><strong>How long has the website being in existence?  </strong> Has this website being in existence long enough to build itself up to be considered an authority site?</li>
<li><strong>How many outgoing links does the link page have?</strong><br />
Web pages that have less than 50 outgoing links are still considered effective enough to exchange with. See it this way: A Search Engine will provide (example) 100 points to each pages outgoing links. If you have one outgoing link it will get the full vote value. If you have 50 outgoing links to other websites, than you vote count is only 2 points. Web pages with limited amount of outgoing links are favorable.</li>
<li><strong>The placement of the link:</strong> Will the link partner allow a submission of your link within a paragraph of keyword related / informative text? This way your outgoing link does not follow the webs usual linking exchange pattern, which overtime could become devalued with Search Engines? The surrounding text reinforces your links keywords and might provide additional boost in the keywords revelance.</li>
</ul>
<h4>2. Passing Traffic</h4>
<ul>
<li>Serves good for targeted and high-volume traffic which could convert to clients. Many times the position of the link is what it takes to get more traffic from the website. On good way to determine the hotspot where visitors look most often is by checking out this site <a href="http://www.poynterextra.org/eyetrack2004/main.htm">EyeTracker</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>3. Passing PageRank</h4>
<ul>
<li>PageRank (PR) is Google rating system of the quality of the website. The bar runs between 1 to 10 and the closer to 10 you can get the more valuable the exchange. In the past, Page Rank has been the main focus point in many webmasters and Search Engine marketers. Page Rank has overtime become less important in Google's overall ranking algorithm, and now it determines the interval of the Search Engines spider / bots return to the website, for faster indexing of new content.</li>
</ul>
<h4>4. TrustRank</h4>
<ul>
<li>TrustRank is the use of a seed list of trusted Google websites in order to combat spammy link tactics. When receiving a link from these trusted group of websites, resulting in higher search engine rankings. Trustrank was born out of a need to test websites for quality links and to combat spam linking efforts. Due to large numbers of webmasters and site owners going to great lengths to get higher rankings with paid links, link farms and other violation of Google's terms of service ' Webmaster Guidelines <a href="http://www2004.org/proceedings/docs/1p403.pdf" target="_blank">Google submitted a patent in 2004 regarding the use of TrustRank</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>Brought to you by <a href="http://info.intensedevelopment.net/">Intense Web Design</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
